Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Orthodontic Extraction of High-Risk Impacted Mandibular Third Molars in Close Proximity to the Mandibular Canal: A Systematic Review Publisher Pubmed



Kalantar Motamedi MR1 ; Heidarpour M2 ; Siadat S1 ; Motamedi AK1 ; Bahreman AA3
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Isfahan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, 81551-39998, Iran
  2. 2. Dental Materials Research Center, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  3. 3. Orthodontic and Pediatric Dentistry Programs, Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester, NY, United States

Source: Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Published:2015


Abstract

Purpose Extraction of mandibular third molars (M3s) in close proximity to the mandibular canal has some inherent risks to adjacent structures, such as neurologic damage to teeth, bone defects distal to the mandibular second molar (M2), or pathologic fractures in association with enlarged dentigerous cysts. The procedure for extrusion and subsequent extraction of high-risk M3s is called orthodontic extraction. This is a systematic review of the available approaches for orthodontic extraction of impacted mandibular M3s in close proximity to the mandibular canal and their outcomes. Materials and Methods The PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), DOAJ, Google Scholar, OpenGrey, Iranian Science Information Database (SID), Iranmedex, and Irandoc databases were searched using specific keywords up to June 2, 2014. Studies were evaluated based on predetermined eligibility criteria, treatment approaches, and their outcomes. Results Thirteen articles met the inclusion criteria. A total of 123 impacted teeth were extracted by orthodontic extraction and 2 cases were complicated by transient paresthesia. Three types of biomechanical approaches were used: 1) using the posterior maxillary region as the anchor for orthodontic extrusion of lower M3s, 2) simple cantilever springs attached to the M3 buttonhole, and 3) cantilever springs tied to a bonded orthodontic bracket on the M3 plus multiple-loop spring wire for distal movement of the M3. Osteo-periodontal status of M2s also improved uneventfully. Conclusion Despite the drawbacks of orthodontic extraction, removal of deeply impacted M3s using the described techniques is safe with regard to mandibular nerve injury and neurologic damage. Orthodontic extraction is recommended for extraction of impacted M3s that present a high risk of postoperative osteo-periodontal defects on the distal surface of the adjacent M2 and those associated with dentigerous cysts. © 2015 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
Other Related Docs
9. Tooth Graft: An Umbrella Overview, European Journal of Dentistry (2024)
35. Comparison of Success Rate and Onset Time of Two Different Anesthesia Techniques, Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal (2015)
44. Edentulism and Tooth Loss in Iran, International Journal of Preventive Medicine (2012)