Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
A Comparison of Tissue-Engineered Bone From Adipose-Derived Stem Cell With Autogenous Bone Repair in Maxillary Alveolar Cleft Model in Dogs Publisher Pubmed



Pourebrahim N1 ; Hashemibeni B2 ; Shahnaseri S1 ; Torabinia N3 ; Mousavi B4 ; Adibi S5 ; Heidari F6 ; Alavi MJ7
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Azahra Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Anatomical Sciences and Molecular Biology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  3. 3. Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Isfahan University of Dental Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  4. 4. Torabinejad Research Center, Isfahan University of Dental Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  5. 5. Veterinary Surgeon, Private Practice, Isfahan, Iran
  6. 6. Torabinejad Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  7. 7. Department of Biology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Published:2013


Abstract

This study was designed to compare bone regeneration of tissue-engineered bone from adipose-derived stem cell and autogenous bone graft in a canine maxillary alveolar cleft model. In this prospective clinical trial, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were isolated from subcutaneous canine adipose tissue. Undifferentiated cells were incubated with a 3 mm × 3 mm × 3 mm hydroxyapatite/beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffold, in specific osteogenic medium for 21 days. Four mongrel dogs were prepared by removal of two of the three incisors bilaterally and a 15 mm defect in bone was created from crest to nasal floor. After healing, repair was followed by a tissue engineered bone graft from adipose-derived stem cells on one side and corticocancellous tibial auto graft on the other side. Bone regeneration was evaluated by histomorphometry on days 15 and 60 after implantation. The data were analysed with descriptive and t test methods (α = 0.05). Bone formation on the autograft sides was higher than on the stem cell sides at 15 and 60 days, 45% and 96% versus 5% and 70%, respectively. Differences between the two groups at 15 and 60 days were significant (p = 0.004 and 0.001, respectively). Although autograft is still the gold standard for bone regeneration, tissue engineered bone may provide an acceptable alternative. © 2012 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
Other Related Docs
11. Tooth Graft: An Umbrella Overview, European Journal of Dentistry (2024)
33. The Effect of Melatonin on Prevention of Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: An Animal Study in Rats, Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (2020)
38. Bone Loss-Related Factors in Tissue and Bone Level Dental Implants: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials, Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (2021)