Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
The Association Between Fat Mass and the Risk of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Publisher Pubmed



Namazi N1, 2 ; Irandoost P3 ; Heshmati J4 ; Larijani B5 ; Azadbakht L2, 6, 7
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Obesity and Eating Habits Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Molecular Cellular Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Diabetes Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Student Research Committee, Department of Nutrition, School of Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Songhor Healthcare Center, Kermanshah University of Medical Science, Kermanshah, Iran
  5. 5. Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  6. 6. Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  7. 7. Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Science, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: Clinical Nutrition Published:2019


Abstract

Background & aims: Several cohort and case–control studies examined the association between fat mass (FM) and the risk of breast cancer; however, findings are conflicting. The purpose of the present study was to systematically review this association and conducted a meta-analysis, if possible. Method: A systematic search of PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science and Embase databases was conducted for cohort and case–control studies, between January 2000 and 31 March 2018 with no language limitations. Multivariate adjusted relative risk (RR) estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each category of FM were pooled to examine the association. Results: Finally, 12 papers were considered for quantitative synthesis. The pooled RR for the highest vs. the lowest FM (%) of cohort studies was 1.44 (95% CI: 1.33, 1.56; I2: 63.3%, p = 0.008). The overall effect size for adjusted case–control studies showed no significant association (1.49, 95% CI: 0.77, 2.90; I2: 93.2%; p = 0.001). After stratification by menopause, it was revealed that the association between FM and the risk of breast cancer in post menopausal women (2.29, 95% CI: 1.12, 4.68; I2: 92%, p = 0.0001) was significant, while there was no significant association in pre-menopausal women (0.68, 95% CI: 0.18, 2.58; I2: 81.3%; p = 0.02). Conclusion: Cohort studies showed that higher FM is positively associated with the risk for breast cancer. However, only case–control studies on post-menopausal women showed a positive link. Due to limited studies and high heterogeneity, findings should be interpreted with caution. More cohort studies are needed to clarify this association. © 2018 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism
Other Related Docs
14. The Association Between Different Kinds of Fat Intake and Breast Cancer Risk in Women, International Journal of Preventive Medicine (2014)
44. What About My Weight? Insufficient Weight Loss or Weight Regain After Bariatric Metabolic Surgery, International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism (2023)