Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Effect of a Non-Ionic Surfactant on Xylene Removal in a Scoria-Compost-Based Biofilter Publisher



Amin MM1, 2 ; Rahimi A3 ; Bina B1, 2 ; Mohammadi Moghadam F4 ; Nourmoradi H5 ; Heidari M6
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Environment Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IUMS) and Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Health, IUMS, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Student Research Center, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Health, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Health, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran
  6. 6. Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Faculty of Health, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran

Source: Clean - Soil, Air, Water Published:2016


Abstract

The effect of a non-ionic surfactant, Tween-20, on xylene removal performance of a previously acclimated scoria-compost-based biofilter was evaluated. In the presence of the surfactant, the maximum elimination capacities (ECmax) of 71.0, 84.1, and 93.6 g m−3 h−1 were obtained for xylene inlet loading rates (ILRs) of 114.9, 124.1, and 197.1 g m−3 h−1 at empty bed residence times (EBRTs) of 40, 60, and 90 s, respectively. When the biofilter was fed the nutrient solution with Tween-20, the average removal efficiency (REavg) was increased approximately 13 and 14% at EBRTs of 40 s (ILRavg of 43–47 g m−3 h−1) and 60 s (ILRavg of 61 g m−3 h−1), respectively. This indicates that the surfactant improved the performance of the biofilter at moderate ILRs. However, the removal of xylene was not significantly affected by the surfactant at high ILRs, around which ECmax was achieved. This means that the non-ionic surfactant probably had a positive effect on the biofiltration of xylene when the diffusion through the biofilm, rather than biodegradation rates, appears to be the main process governing the performance of biofilter. Overall, this study showed that Tween-20, in terms of xylene removal efficiency, may not have similar effects on the performance of biofilter at various loading conditions. © 2016 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
18. Use of a Uv/H2o2 Process for Posttreatment of a Biologically Treated Composting Leachate, Turkish Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences (2014)
20. Comparison of the Biological Nh3 Removal Characteristics of a Three Stage Biofilter With a One Stage Biofilter, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology (2006)