Comparison of Different Doses of Subconjunctival Sunitinib With Bevacizumab in the Treatment of Corneal Neovascularization in Experimental Rats Publisher



Hashemian MN¹ ; Mahrjerdi HZ^{1, 2} ; Mazloumi M¹ ; Safizadeh MS¹ ; Shakiba Y³ ; Rahimi F¹ ; Afarideh M² ; Zare MA¹ ; Tafti MF¹ ; Sepidan BB¹ ; Abtahi MA⁴ ; Abtahi SH⁴ Show Affiliations
Source: Journal of Research in Medical Sciences Published:2017

Abstract

Background: To compare the efficacy of subconjunctival administration of bevacizumab and different doses of sunitinib malate in reducing corneal neovascularization (CNV). Materials and Methods: In this experimental study, central corneal cauterization was created in the right eye of fifty male Sprague–Dawley rats. On day 1 (1 week after cauterization), rats were randomly assigned into five treatment groups. Group control (n = 10) received subconjunctival injection of 0.02 ml of base saline solution. Group 1 (n = 10) received 0.02 ml of bevacizumab (25 mg/ml). Group 2, 3, and 4 (n = 10 for each group) were treated with 0.02 ml of sunitinib malate (10, 20, and 50 μg/ml, respectively). On days 1, 7, and 14, digital photographs of the cornea were taken, and the area of CNV was measured. Results: During the 2‑week follow‑up, CNV area in treatment groups was less than in control group (P < 0.05). On day 7, corneal avascular area was highest in Group 3 at 63%. On day 14, the area of CNV in Groups 2 and 3 was less than in Group 1 (P = 0.031 and 0.011, respectively), but the difference between Groups 2 and 3 was not statistically significant (P = 0.552). The decreased CNV area on day 14 in Group 4 was significant in comparison to bevacizumab, but it was not significant on day 7 (P = 0.25 on day 7 and 0.002 on day 14). Conclusion: Subconjunctival sunitinib malate is more effective than bevacizumab in regressing CNV. This effect is more prominent on day 14. © 2017 Journal of Research in Medical Sciences.