Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Development of a Tool for Comprehensive Evaluation of Population-Based Cancer Registries Publisher Pubmed



Sheikhtaheri A1, 2 ; Nahvijou A3 ; Sedighi Z3 ; Hadji M3 ; Golmahi M3 ; Roshandel G4 ; Beiki O5, 6 ; Ravankhah Z7 ; Zendehdel K3
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Health Management and Economics Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Health Information Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Cancer Research Center of Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Golestan Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
  5. 5. Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
  6. 6. Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  7. 7. CDC, Isfahan Province Health Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: International Journal of Medical Informatics Published:2018


Abstract

Objective: Several methods have been suggested for evaluation of population-based cancer registries (PBCR) worldwide. However, most of these methods evaluate the data and outputs of the cancer registries. This study aimed to develop a comprehensive tool and protocol for evaluation of inputs, processes and outputs of a PBCR. Methods: The standards of the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR) were used to draft a comprehensive checklist. In addition, the national guidelines of PBCR were used to develop a questionnaire for evaluation of knowledge and practice of the PBCR personnel. Furthermore, a protocol for evaluation of the completeness and validity of the PBCR data was developed according to the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and the NAACCR guidelines. A 0–4 Likert based score and expert opinions (10 experts) were used to assess validity of the eight questionnaires/checklists. A modified Delphi method was applied to validate the checklists and questionnaires. Questions with a score higher than 3 remained in the final tools. Results: The final package consists of 546 questions including 108 (19.8%) for evaluation of guidelines, 54 (9.9%) for analysis and reports, 87 (15.9%) for governance and infrastructure, 155 (28.4%) for information technology, 21 (3.8%) for personnel knowledge and 121 (22.2%) for their practice. Additionally, data quality indicators were also considered for evaluation of PBCRs. Conclusion: This comprehensive tool can be used to show the gaps and limitations of the PBCR programs and provide informative clues for their improvement. © 2018
Other Related Docs
9. Cancer Epidemiology and Trends in Sistan and Baluchestan Province, Iran, Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran (2015)
18. Psycho-Oncology Curriculum Needs Assessment in Postgraduate Education, International Journal of Body, Mind and Culture (2020)
22. Iranian Nurses Perceptions of Cancer Patients Quality of Life, International Journal of Cancer Management (2016)
24. Development and Validation of the Clinical Information Literacy Questionnaire, Journal of Education and Health Promotion (2023)
32. Iran National Cancer Control Program (Irnccp): Goals, Strategies, and Programs, Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran (2022)
43. Investigation of Bladder Cancer Incidence in Isfahan, Iran, Tehran University Medical Journal (2019)