Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Articaine Buccal Infiltration for Mandibular First Molars With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: Is It As Effective As Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block With Lidocaine? a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Publisher Pubmed



Saatchi M1 ; Mohammadi G1 ; Iranmanesh P1 ; Khademi A1 ; Farhad A1 ; Aggarwal V2 ; Kolahi J3
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Endodontics, Dental Research Center, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India
  3. 3. Independent Research Scientist, Founder and Managing Editor of Dental Hypotheses, Isfahan, Iran

Source: Clinical Oral Investigations Published:2025


Abstract

Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine buccal infiltration (BI) with 2% lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) for mandibular first molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. Methods: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the anesthetic efficiency of one cartridge of 4% articaine BI (as the primary injection) with one cartridge of 2% lidocaine IANB in permanent first mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis were searched in five databases. The risk of bias (RoB) was evaluated using the RoB2 (Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool). A fixed-effects meta-analysis was performed using STATA software. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results: Out of 780 records, five RCTs were included. The meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in the success rates of articaine BI and lidocaine IANB [Risk ratio (RR) = 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) = (0.93, 1.20), I2 = 24.51%)]. The certainty of the evidence was graded as “moderate”. Conclusions: The moderate certainty of evidence suggests that the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine BI is comparable to 2% lidocaine IANB for mandibular first molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. However, more clinical trials are needed. Clinical relevance: BI with 4% articaine for mandibular first molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis can be an alternative for clinicians compared with 2% lidocaine IANB. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2025.
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
31. Tooth Graft: An Umbrella Overview, European Journal of Dentistry (2024)
36. Functional Needs in Orthognathic Patients With Different Sagittal Skeletal Discrepancies, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology (2024)
40. Comparison of Success Rate and Onset Time of Two Different Anesthesia Techniques, Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal (2015)
45. To Splint or Not to Splint Tooth and Adjacent Dental Implants: An Overview of Reviews, International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry (2023)