Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Stem Cell Factor Plasma Level in Glioblastoma Multiforme Patients Publisher Pubmed



Kefayat A1 ; Amouheidari A2 ; Ghahremani F3 ; Alirezaei Z4
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Oncology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Isfahan Milad Hospital, Isfahan, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Medical Physics and Radiotherapy, School of Paramedicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Medical Physics and Radiotherapy, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: Cancer Medicine Published:2021


Abstract

Background: Investigation of novel blood-circulating agents as potential biomarkers for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients’ diagnosis and monitoring has gained lots of attention, due to limitations of imaging modalities and invasive tissue biopsy procedures. The present study aims to assess the diagnostic and prognostic values of preoperative stem cell factor (SCF) plasma level in GBM patients. Methods: Preoperative plasma samples from 58 GBM patients and 20 patients with nonglial tumors and 30 healthy controls were obtained. SCF levels were measured by employing the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test and the values were compared between these three groups. Then, the association of SCF plasma level and tumor volume, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) for the GBM patients were evaluated. Results: Mean preoperative SCF plasma level of the GBM patients (2.80 ± 1.52 ng/ml) was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) than the healthy controls (0.80 ± 0.24 ng/ml) and patients with nonglial tumor (1.41 ± 0.76 ng/ml). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that the preoperative SCF plasma level could distinguish the GBM patients from healthy controls and patients with nonglial tumors with the area under curve values of 0.915 and 0.790, respectively. However, no significant association was observed between the GBM patients’ preoperative SCF plasma levels and tumors’ volume (Spearman Rho correlation coefficient, 0.1847; 95% CI, p = 0.1652). The GBM patients were divided into two subgroups based on mean preoperative SCF plasma levels (2.80 ng/ml). No significant difference was observed between the patients’ PFS (p = 0.3792) and OS (p = 0.1469) at these two subgroups. Conclusion: Taking together, the SCF plasma level can serve as a novel diagnostic blood-circulating biomarker for patients with GBM. However, its plasma level is not correlated with GBM patients’ tumor volume, PFS, or OS. © 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.