Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Additive Manufacturing of Bioactive Glasses: Focus on Bone Tissue Engineering



Mozafari M1 ; Kargozar S2 ; Kermani F3 ; Milan PB4, 5, 6 ; Baino F7
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Research Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
  2. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX75390, United States
  3. 3. Tissue Engineering Research Group (TERG), Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, 917794-8564, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  6. 6. Institute of Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  7. 7. Department of Applied Science and Technology (DISAT), Institute of Materials Physics and Engineering, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Torino, Italy

Source: Bioceramics: Status in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (Part 2) Published:2024

Abstract

In tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, bioactive glasses (BGs) offer many potential advantages. These inorganic substances belong to the bioceramics family and are traditionally produced in powder and granular formats via the sol-gel and melt-quenching synthesis routes. In order to mimic the native structure of human tissues, BGs should be fabricated into three-dimensional (3D) constructs (i.e., scaffolds). There are specific conventional fabrication methods for producing BG-based scaffolds (e.g., foam replication); however, they suffer from some critical limitations such as the lack of exact control on the pore dimension and distribution. In this regard, additive manufacturing (AM), also known as 3D printing, has emerged for the generation of precise and high-resolution BG-based scaffolds. Currently, 3D printing of BG-based scaffolds is performed by using a series of well-developed AM techniques, including direct 3D printing, selective laser sintering (SLS), robocasting, and stereolithography (SLA). In some methods, BGs are added to polymeric matrices and then introduced into the 3D printing machine as a raw material. In general, 3D-printed constructs exhibit important advantages over conventionally-fabricated tissue-engineering scaffolds in terms of reproducibility, scalability, architecture (e.g., controllable strut thickness, pore shape and size), and biomechanical properties. It is of significance that BGs can be simultaneously printed with mammalian cells (e.g., stem cells), known as 3D bioprinting. Still, some challenges (e.g., decreased cell viability) remain that should be addressed by conducting further research and proposing innovative solutions. © 2024 Bentham Science Publishers.
Other Related Docs
6. Bioactive Glasses: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?, Journal of Functional Biomaterials (2018)
12. 3D Bio-Printing Technology for Body Tissues and Organs Regeneration, Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology (2018)
13. Challenges in Three-Dimensional Printing of Bone Substitutes, Tissue Engineering - Part B: Reviews (2019)
20. Recent Advances on 3D-Printed Pcl-Based Composite Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology (2023)
23. Bioactive Glasses Entering the Mainstream, Drug Discovery Today (2018)
29. Silk As a Promising Biomaterial for 3D Bioprinting: A Comprehensive Review of Bombyx Mori Silk’S Biomedical Applications, International Journal of Polymeric Materials and Polymeric Biomaterials (2024)