Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share By
Face-To-Face Interviews Versus Internet Surveys: Comparison of Two Data Collection Methods in the Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology Study: Implications for Population-Based Research Publisher Pubmed



Sperber AD1 ; Bor S2 ; Fang X3 ; Bangdiwala SI4, 5 ; Drossman DA6 ; Ghoshal UC7 ; Simren M8, 9 ; Tack J8, 10 ; Whitehead WE9 ; Dumitrascu DL11 ; Fukudo S12 ; Kellow J13 ; Okeke E14 ; Quigley EMM15 Show All Authors
Authors
  1. Sperber AD1
  2. Bor S2
  3. Fang X3
  4. Bangdiwala SI4, 5
  5. Drossman DA6
  6. Ghoshal UC7
  7. Simren M8, 9
  8. Tack J8, 10
  9. Whitehead WE9
  10. Dumitrascu DL11
  11. Fukudo S12
  12. Kellow J13
  13. Okeke E14
  14. Quigley EMM15
  15. Schmulson M16
  16. Whorwell P17
  17. Archampong T18
  18. Adibi P19
  19. Andresen V20
  20. Benninga MA21
  21. Bonaz B22
  22. Fernandez LB23
  23. Choi SC24
  24. Corazziari ES25
  25. Francisconi C26
  26. Hani A27
  27. Lazebnik L28
  28. Lee YY29
  29. Mulak A30
  30. Rahman MM31
  31. Santos J32
  32. Setshedi M33
  33. Syam AF34
  34. Vanner S35
  35. Wong RK36
  36. Lopezcolombo A37
  37. Costa V27
  38. Dickman R38
  39. Kanazawa M12
  40. Keshteli AH39
  41. Khatun R4
  42. Maleki I40
  43. Poitras P41
  44. Pratap N42
  45. Stefanyuk O28
  46. Thomson S33
  47. Buyruk M2
  48. Unal N2
  49. Huang D43
  50. Song J44
  51. Hreinsson JP8
  52. Palsson OS9

Source: Neurogastroenterology and Motility Published:2023


Abstract

Background and Aims: The Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology Study (RFGES) assessed the prevalence, burden, and associated factors of Disorders of Gut–Brain Interaction (DGBI) in 33 countries around the world. Achieving worldwide sampling necessitated use of two different surveying methods: In-person household interviews (9 countries) and Internet surveys (26 countries). Two countries, China and Turkey, were surveyed with both methods. This paper examines the differences in the survey results with the two methods, as well as likely reasons for those differences. Methods: The two RFGES survey methods are described in detail, and differences in DGBI findings summarized for household versus Internet surveys globally, and in more detail for China and Turkey. Logistic regression analysis was used to elucidate factors contributing to these differences. Results: Overall, DGBI were only half as prevalent when assessed with household vs Internet surveys. Similar patterns of methodology-related DGBI differences were seen within both China and Turkey, but prevalence differences between the survey methods were dramatically larger in Turkey. No clear reasons for outcome differences by survey method were identified, although greater relative reduction in bowel and anorectal versus upper gastrointestinal disorders when household versus Internet surveying was used suggests an inhibiting influence of social sensitivity. Conclusions: The findings strongly indicate that besides affecting data quality, manpower needs and data collection time and costs, the choice of survey method is a substantial determinant of symptom reporting and DGBI prevalence outcomes. This has important implications for future DGBI research and epidemiological research more broadly. © 2023 The Authors. Neurogastroenterology & Motility published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Other Related Docs