Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Machine Learning-Based Prognostic Modeling Using Clinical Data and Quantitative Radiomic Features From Chest Ct Images in Covid-19 Patients Publisher Pubmed



Shiri I1 ; Sorouri M2 ; Geramifar P3 ; Nazari M4 ; Abdollahi M2 ; Salimi Y1 ; Khosravi B2 ; Askari D5 ; Aghaghazvini L6 ; Hajianfar G7 ; Kasaeian A2, 8, 9 ; Abdollahi H10 ; Arabi H1 ; Rahmim A11, 12 Show All Authors
Authors
  1. Shiri I1
  2. Sorouri M2
  3. Geramifar P3
  4. Nazari M4
  5. Abdollahi M2
  6. Salimi Y1
  7. Khosravi B2
  8. Askari D5
  9. Aghaghazvini L6
  10. Hajianfar G7
  11. Kasaeian A2, 8, 9
  12. Abdollahi H10
  13. Arabi H1
  14. Rahmim A11, 12
  15. Radmard AR6
  16. Zaidi H1, 13, 14, 15
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, CH-1211, Switzerland
  2. 2. Digestive Diseases Research Center, Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Research Center for Nuclear Medicine, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Biomedical Engineering and Medical Physics, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Radiology Technology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  6. 6. Department of Radiology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  7. 7. Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  8. 8. Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center, Research Institute for Oncology, Hematology and Cell Therapy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  9. 9. Inflammation Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  10. 10. Department of Radiologic Sciences and Medical Physics, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
  11. 11. Departments of Radiology and Physics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  12. 12. Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  13. 13. Geneva University Neurocenter, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
  14. 14. Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
  15. 15. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

Source: Computers in Biology and Medicine Published:2021


Abstract

Objective: To develop prognostic models for survival (alive or deceased status) prediction of COVID-19 patients using clinical data (demographics and history, laboratory tests, visual scoring by radiologists) and lung/lesion radiomic features extracted from chest CT images. Methods: Overall, 152 patients were enrolled in this study protocol. These were divided into 106 training/validation and 46 test datasets (untouched during training), respectively. Radiomic features were extracted from the segmented lungs and infectious lesions separately from chest CT images. Clinical data, including patients’ history and demographics, laboratory tests and radiological scores were also collected. Univariate analysis was first performed (q-value reported after false discovery rate (FDR) correction) to determine the most predictive features among all imaging and clinical data. Prognostic modeling of survival was performed using radiomic features and clinical data, separately or in combination. Maximum relevance minimum redundancy (MRMR) and XGBoost were used for feature selection and classification. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were used to assess the prognostic performance of the models on the test datasets. Results: For clinical data, cancer comorbidity (q-value < 0.01), consciousness level (q-value < 0.05) and radiological score involved zone (q-value < 0.02) were found to have high correlated features with outcome. Oxygen saturation (AUC = 0.73, q-value < 0.01) and Blood Urea Nitrogen (AUC = 0.72, q-value = 0.72) were identified as high clinical features. For lung radiomic features, SAHGLE (AUC = 0.70) and HGLZE (AUC = 0.67) from GLSZM were identified as most prognostic features. Amongst lesion radiomic features, RLNU from GLRLM (AUC = 0.73), HGLZE from GLSZM (AUC = 0.73) had the highest performance. In multivariate analysis, combining lung, lesion and clinical features was determined to provide the most accurate prognostic model (AUC = 0.95 ± 0.029 (95%CI: 0.95–0.96), accuracy = 0.88 ± 0.046 (95% CI: 0.88–0.89), sensitivity = 0.88 ± 0.066 (95% CI = 0.87–0.9) and specificity = 0.89 ± 0.07 (95% CI = 0.87–0.9)). Conclusion: Combination of radiomic features and clinical data can effectively predict outcome in COVID-19 patients. The developed model has significant potential for improved management of COVID-19 patients. © 2021 The Author(s)
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
10. Non-Invasive Pnet Grading Using Ct Radiomics and Machine Learning, Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging and Visualization (2025)
26. Green Chemistry and Coronavirus, Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy (2021)
31. The Role of Emergency Radiology in Covid-19: From Preparedness to Diagnosis, Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal (2020)
34. The Role of Medical Imaging in Covid-19, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology (2021)