The Effect of Preparation Design on the Fracture Resistance and Adaptation of the Cerec Ceramic Endocrowns Publisher Pubmed



Jalali S¹ ; Jalali H² ; Kharazi Fard MJ¹ ; Abdolrahmani A¹ ; Alikhasi M³ Show Affiliations
Source: Clinical and Experimental Dental Research Published:2023

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this experimental in vitro study was to assess the effect of having one or two intact axial walls on the improvement of the fracture resistance, and marginal and internal adaptation of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturer fabricated ceramic endocrowns. Materials and Methods: Thirty-six endodontically treated mandibular molars were divided into three groups (n = 12). Group A, represented teeth that all of their axial walls were reduced till they all had 3 mm height. In group B, the buccal wall had 5 mm height and the others were reduced to 3 mm. Specimens of the group C had 5-mm-height buccal and one 5 mm-height proximal wall, with all other walls of 3 mm height. All teeth were scanned using intraoral scanner, and endocrowns were milled from zirconia lithium silicate ceramics blocks. The marginal and internal discrepancy of restorations were evaluated with the replica technique. Fracture resistance was also measured after cementation and modes of failure were observed. One-way analysis of variance and Tukey HSD multiple comparisons were used to analyze the data (α =.5). Results: Significant differences were observed within the groups in terms of the axial discrepancy (p =.022); group A had significantly higher amounts of axial discrepancy compared to group B (p =.001) and group C (p =.003). Preservation of the intact axial walls did not result in a statistically significant decrease in marginal (p =.21) and pulpal (p =.31) discrepancy values. Also, concerning the fracture resistance no significant difference was observed among the groups (p =.51). Conclusion: Preservation of at least one of the axial walls could reduce the amount of the axial discrepancy and, therefore, improves the adaptation of the restoration. However, based on this study, it did not improve fracture resistance. © 2023 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.