Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Effect of Co-Exposure to Heat and Psychological Stressors on Sperm Dna and Semen Parameters Publisher



Abdollahi F1 ; Farhang Dehghan S2 ; Amanpour S3 ; Haghparast A4 ; Sabour S5 ; Zendehdel R2
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Health and Safety at work, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Environmental and Occupational Hazards Control Research Center, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Cancer Biology Research Center, Cancer Institute of Iran, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Neuroscience Research Center, Shahid Beheshti Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Toxicology Reports Published:2021


Abstract

The present study aims to investigate the effects of co-exposure to heat and psychological stress on sperm DNA and semen parameters among male rats. The study was conducted on 40 healthy adult male Wistar rats. The rats were randomly categorized into four groups of same size consisting of a control group, a heat stress, psychological and co-exposure groups. The heat stress group was exposed to a temperature of 36 °C at 20% relative humidity. The psychological stress exposure group was subjected to three stressors including exposure to strobe light, noise and tilting cage. According the results,the co-exposure group had lower mean sperm parameters including sperm count (17.22 ± 4.22 106/ml), motility (42.63 ± 12.95 %), viability (48.50 ± 23.25 %), normal morphology (56 ± 7.5%), progressive motility (11.61 ± 7.81%), non-progressive motility (31.18 ± 7.77%), curvilinear velocity (24.11 ± 3.81 μm/s) and straight-line velocity (3.2 ± 1.4 μm/s) when compared with those of the other groups (P = 0.001). Mean sperm immobility (57.36 ± 12.95%) and non-progressive motility (37.93 ± 11.15%) in the co-exposure group was higher compared to the other groups (P = 0.001 and P = 0.333, respectively). Assessment of damage to sperm DNA revealed that the heat exposure group had a higher percentage of sperm DNA damage (9.44 ± 6.80 %) compared to others (P = 0.185). In case of all of exposure scenario, the chance that the semen quality decreased compared to the control group has been increased. In general the combined stress had a greater significant effect on sperm parameters compared to other exposure groups, except for DNA damage. © 2021 The Authors