Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Effect of Vitamins C and E on Insulin Resistance in Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis Study Publisher Pubmed



Khodaeian M1 ; Tabatabaeimalazy O2 ; Qorbani M3, 4 ; Farzadfar F4 ; Amini P5 ; Larijani B1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Diabetes Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran
  4. 4. Non-Communicable Disease Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran university of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States

Source: European Journal of Clinical Investigation Published:2015


Abstract

Background: Data regarding the effect of vitamin C (VC) and vitamin E (VE) supplementation on insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are controversial. We aimed to systematically review the current data on this topic. Materials and methods: All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted to assess the effect of VC and/or VE on insulin resistance in diabetes published in Google Scholar and PubMed web databases until January 2014 were included. Exclusion criteria were studies conducted in animal, type 1 DM, children or pregnant women. Main outcome measure was insulin resistance by homoeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index. According to degree of heterogeneity, fixed- or random-effect model was employed by stata software (11.0). Results: We selected 14 RCTs involving 735 patients with T2DM. VE or mixture-mode supplementation did not have any significant effect on HOMA with a standardized mean difference (SMD): 0·017, 95% CI: -0·376 to 0·411 (P = 0·932); and SMD: -0·035, 95% CI: -0·634 to 0·025 (P = 0·070), respectively, by random-effect model. VC supplement alone did not improve insulin resistance with a SMD: -0·150, 95% CI: -0·494 to 0·194 (P = 0·391), by fixed-effect model. Meta-regression test demonstrated that HOMA index may have not been influenced by the year of publication, dosage or duration of treatment. Conclusions: The sole intake of VC, VE or their combination with other antioxidants could not improve insulin resistance in diabetes. © 2015 Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation.
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
28. Polymorphisms of Antioxidant Genes As a Target for Diabetes Management, International Journal of Molecular and Cellular Medicine (2017)
31. Prevalence of Preeclampsia and Eclampsia in Iran, Archives of Iranian Medicine (2016)