Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Liquid Calibration Phantoms in Ultra-Low-Dose Qct for the Assessment of Bone Mineral Density Publisher Pubmed



Malekzadeh M1 ; Abbasirad S2, 3 ; Keyak JH4 ; Nabil M5 ; Asadi M6, 7 ; Mobini N2, 3 ; Naghdi P2 ; Emadi H8 ; Saligheh Rad H2, 3 ; Shiran MB1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Medical Physics Department, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Quantitative Medical Imaging Systems Group, Research Center for Molecular and Cellular Imaging, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering Department, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Radiological Sciences, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA, United States
  5. 5. Department of Mathematics, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin Branch, Qazvin, Iran
  6. 6. Osteoporosis Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  7. 7. Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  8. 8. Department of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran

Source: Journal of Clinical Densitometry Published:2020


Abstract

Introduction: Cortical bone is affected by metabolic diseases. Some studies have shown that lower cortical bone mineral density (BMD) is related to increases in fracture risk which could be diagnosed by quantitative computed tomography (QCT). Nowadays, hybrid iterative reconstruction-based (HIR) computed tomography (CT) could be helpful to quantify the peripheral bone tissue. A key focus of this paper is to evaluate liquid calibration phantoms for BMD quantification in the tibia and under hybrid iterative reconstruction-based-CT with the different hydrogen dipotassium phosphate (K2HPO4) concentrations phantoms. Methodology: Four ranges of concentrations of K2HPO4 were made and tested with 2 exposure settings. Accuracy of the phantoms with ash gravimetry and intermediate K2HPO4 concentration as hypothetical patients were evaluated. The correlations and mean differences between measured equivalent QCT BMD and ash density as a gold standard were calculated. Relative percentage error (RPE) in CT numbers of each concentration over a 6-mo period was reported. Results: The correlation values (R2 was close to 1.0), suggested that the precision of QCT-BMD measurements using standard and ultra-low dose settings were similar for all phantoms. The mean differences between QCT-BMD and the ash density for low concentrations (about 93 mg/cm3) were lower than high concentration phantoms with 135 and 234 mg/cm3 biases. In regard to accuracy test for hypothetical patient, RPE was up to 16.1% for the low concentration (LC) phantom for the case of high mineral content. However, the lowest RPE (0.4 to 1.8%) was obtained for the high concentration (HC) phantom, particularly for the high mineral content case. In addition, over 6 months, the K2HPO4 concentrations increased 25% for 50 mg/cm3 solution and 0.7 % for 1300 mg/cm3 solution in phantoms. Conclusion: The excellent linear correlations between the QCT equivalent density and the ash density gold standard indicate that QCT can be used with submilisivert radiation dose. We conclude that using liquid calibration phantoms with a range of mineral content similar to that being measured will minimize bias. Finally, we suggest performing BMD measurements with ultra-low dose scan concurrent with iterative-based reconstruction to reduce radiation exposure. © 2019 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry
Related Docs
1. Design and Validation of Synchronous Qct Calibration Phantom: Practical Methodology, Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences (2019)
Experts (# of related papers)