Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
A Systematic Review of Decision Aids for Mammography Screening: Focus on Outcomes and Characteristics Publisher Pubmed



Esmaeili M1, 2 ; Ayyoubzadeh SM1, 2 ; Javanmard Z1, 3 ; R Niakan Kalhori S1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Students’ Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Health Information Technology, Ferdows School of Paramedical and Health, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran

Source: International Journal of Medical Informatics Published:2021


Abstract

Purpose: Decision Aid systems (DAs) provide information on the pros and cons of mammography. This study aimed to review the research on mammography DAs, synthesize the findings related to their outcomes and characteristics, and address the existed research gap. Methods: Relevant studies were identified through a comprehensive search on some e-databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science in August 2020; by searching the keywords of “Breast cancer”, “Screening”, and “Decision aid systems” as well as their synonyms in the titles and abstracts of the papers with no time limits. Among the selected English journal papers with the interventional study design, those measuring outcome values of using mammography DAs were recognized as eligible for being included in this review. Results: The systematic search results in 16 DAs regarding mammography that were designed and then evaluated from 18 selected studies. The results showed that DAs provide improvements in knowledge and informed choice, the decreased decisional conflicts and decisional confidence, almost without changing any attitude towards mammography, mammography participation rates, psychological issues, anticipated regret, and perceived risk of breast cancer. The DAs' effects on women's inclination to screening were divergent. In other words, the DAs affect individuals’ inclination in rare cases; however, on occasion, they could affect women's decision to undergo screening. Conclusion: DAs could correct the bias attached to the existing knowledge on mammography and breast cancer in women so that they are more likely to make a precise decision. Additionally, it might be of central importance in shared decision-making and assisting health providers, in order to promote the quality of care. Accordingly, performing more studies is needed to develop more professional DAs in various countries with different facilities, cultures, and languages. © 2021 Elsevier B.V.