Assessment of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Mr Imaging for Differential Diagnosis of Breast Lesions and Evaluation of Response: A Systematic Review Publisher



Sahib MA¹ ; Arvin A² ; Ahmadinejad N³ ; Bustan RA¹ ; Dakhil HA¹ Show Affiliations
Source: Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Published:2022

Abstract

Background: The current study aimed to assess the performance for quantitative differentiation and evaluation of response in categorized observations from intravoxel incoherent motion analyses of patients based on breast tumors. To assess the presence of heterogeneity, the Cochran's Q tests for heterogeneity with a significance level of P < 0.1 and I2 statistic with values > 75% were used. A random-effects meta-analysis model was used to estimate pooled sensitivity and specificity. The standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals of the true diffusivity (D), pseudo-diffusivity (D*), perfusion fraction (f) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were calculated, and publication bias was evaluated using the Begg's and Egger's tests and also funnel plot. Data were analyzed by STATA v 16 (StataCorp, College Station). Results: The pooled D value demonstrated good measurement performance showed a sensitivity 86%, specificity 86%, and AUC 0.91 (SMD − 1.50, P < 0.001) in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions, which was comparable to that of the ADC that showed a sensitivity of 76%, specificity 79%, and AUC 0.85 (SMD 1.34, P = 0.01), then by the f it showed a sensitivity 80%, specificity 76%, and AUC 0.85 (SMD 0.89, P = 0.001), and D* showed a sensitivity 84%, specificity 59%, and AUC 0.71 (SMD − 0.30, P = 0.20). Conclusion: The estimated sensitivity and specificity in the current meta-analysis were acceptable. So, this approach can be used as a suitable method in the differentiation and evaluation response of breast tumors. © 2022, The Author(s).