Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Closing the Loop Between Brain and Electrical Stimulation: Towards Precision Neuromodulation Treatments Publisher Pubmed



Soleimani G1, 2 ; Nitsche MA3, 4 ; Bergmann TO5, 6 ; Towhidkhah F2 ; Violante IR7 ; Lorenz R8, 9, 10 ; Kuplicki R11 ; Tsuchiyagaito A11 ; Mulyana B11, 12 ; Mayeli A13 ; Ghobadiazbari P14, 15 ; Mosayebisamani M3 ; Zilverstand A1 ; Paulus MP11 Show All Authors
Authors
  1. Soleimani G1, 2
  2. Nitsche MA3, 4
  3. Bergmann TO5, 6
  4. Towhidkhah F2
  5. Violante IR7
  6. Lorenz R8, 9, 10
  7. Kuplicki R11
  8. Tsuchiyagaito A11
  9. Mulyana B11, 12
  10. Mayeli A13
  11. Ghobadiazbari P14, 15
  12. Mosayebisamani M3
  13. Zilverstand A1
  14. Paulus MP11
  15. Bikson M16
  16. Ekhtiari H1, 11
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
  2. 2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Leibniz Research Center for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany
  4. 4. Bielefeld University, University Hospital OWL, Protestant Hospital of Bethel Foundation, University Clinic of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, and University Clinic of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Bielefeld, Germany
  5. 5. Neuroimaging Center, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
  6. 6. Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany
  7. 7. School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guilford, United Kingdom
  8. 8. Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
  9. 9. MRC CBU, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  10. 10. Department of Neurophysics, MPI, Leipzig, Germany
  11. 11. Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, United States
  12. 12. School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Tulsa, OK, United States
  13. 13. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburg, PA, United States
  14. 14. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran
  15. 15. Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  16. 16. City University of New York, New York, NY, United States

Source: Translational Psychiatry Published:2023


Abstract

One of the most critical challenges in using noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques for the treatment of psychiatric and neurologic disorders is inter- and intra-individual variability in response to NIBS. Response variations in previous findings suggest that the one-size-fits-all approach does not seem the most appropriate option for enhancing stimulation outcomes. While there is a growing body of evidence for the feasibility and effectiveness of individualized NIBS approaches, the optimal way to achieve this is yet to be determined. Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) is one of the NIBS techniques showing promising results in modulating treatment outcomes in several psychiatric and neurologic disorders, but it faces the same challenge for individual optimization. With new computational and methodological advances, tES can be integrated with real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (rtfMRI) to establish closed-loop tES-fMRI for individually optimized neuromodulation. Closed-loop tES-fMRI systems aim to optimize stimulation parameters based on minimizing differences between the model of the current brain state and the desired value to maximize the expected clinical outcome. The methodological space to optimize closed-loop tES fMRI for clinical applications includes (1) stimulation vs. data acquisition timing, (2) fMRI context (task-based or resting-state), (3) inherent brain oscillations, (4) dose-response function, (5) brain target trait and state and (6) optimization algorithm. Closed-loop tES-fMRI technology has several advantages over non-individualized or open-loop systems to reshape the future of neuromodulation with objective optimization in a clinically relevant context such as drug cue reactivity for substance use disorder considering both inter and intra-individual variations. Using multi-level brain and behavior measures as input and desired outcomes to individualize stimulation parameters provides a framework for designing personalized tES protocols in precision psychiatry. © 2023, Springer Nature Limited.
Other Related Docs
21. Tinnitus Rehabilitation Through Electrical Stimulation As a Neuromodulation Method: A Scoping Review, Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery (2025)
27. A Novel Intervention Technology for Cerebral Palsy: Brain Stimulation, Iranian Journal of Child Neurology (2019)