Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Characteristics and Health Effects of Formaldehyde and Acetaldehyde in an Urban Area in Iran Publisher Pubmed



Delikhoon M1 ; Fazlzadeh M2, 5 ; Sorooshian A3, 4 ; Baghani AN5, 6 ; Golaki M7 ; Ashournejad Q8 ; Barkhordari A9
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
  2. 2. Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
  4. 4. Department of Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
  5. 5. Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  6. 6. Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
  7. 7. Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  8. 8. Department of Remote Sensing & GIS, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
  9. 9. Department of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran

Source: Environmental Pollution Published:2018


Abstract

This study reports a spatiotemporal characterization of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde in the summer and winter of 2017 in the urban area of Shiraz, Iran. Sampling was fulfilled according to EPA Method TO-11 A. The inverse distance weighting (IDW) procedure was used for spatial mapping. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to evaluate carcinogenic and non-cancer risk owing to formaldehyde and acetaldehyde exposure in 11 age groups. The average concentrations of formaldehyde/acetaldehyde in the summer and winter were 15.07/8.40 μg m−3 and 8.57/3.52 μg m−3, respectively. The formaldehyde to acetaldehyde ratios in the summer and winter were 1.80 and 2.43, respectively. The main sources of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde were photochemical generation, vehicular traffic, and biogenic emissions (e.g., coniferous and deciduous trees). The mean inhalation lifetime cancer risk (LTCR) values according to the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) for formaldehyde and acetaldehyde in summer and winter ranged between 7.55 × 10−6 and 9.25 × 10−5, which exceed the recommended value by US EPA. The average LTCR according to the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) for formaldehyde and acetaldehyde in summer and winter were between 4.82 × 10−6 and 2.58 × 10−4, which exceeds recommended values for five different age groups (Birth to <1, 1 to <2, 2 to <3, 3 to <6, and 6 to <11 years). Hazard quotients (HQs) of formaldehyde ranged between 0.04 and 4.18 for both seasons, while the HQs for acetaldehyde were limited between 0.42 and 0.97. © 2018 Elsevier Ltd
Other Related Docs
14. Indoor Air Quality in Waterpipe Cafes: Exposure Level to Particulate Matter, Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2019)
19. Formaldehyde, Encyclopedia of Toxicology# Fourth Edition: Volume 1-9 (2023)
23. Levels of Formaldehyde in Residential Indoor Air of Gonabad, Iran, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment (2020)
31. Hydrogen Sulfide Concentrations in Indoor Air of Thermal Springs, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment (2018)
38. Fuzzy Modelling of Benzene Health Risk Assessment in Khark Island, Air Quality# Atmosphere and Health (2022)
39. The Effects of Ventilation and Building Characteristics on Indoor Air Quality in Waterpipe Cafes, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (2020)