Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Bone Engineering in Dog Mandible: Coculturing Mesenchymal Stem Cells With Endothelial Progenitor Cells in a Composite Scaffold Containing Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Publisher Pubmed



Khojasteh A1, 2, 4 ; Fahimipour F3 ; Jafarian M1, 4 ; Sharifi D5 ; Jahangir S6 ; Khayyatan F6 ; Baghaban Eslaminejad M6
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
  3. 3. Department of Dental Biomaterial, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Veterinary Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
  6. 6. Department of Stem Cells and Developmental Biology, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran, Iran

Source: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials Published:2017


Abstract

We sought to assess the effects of coculturing mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in the repair of dog mandible bone defects. The cells were delivered in β-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds coated with poly lactic co-glycolic acid microspheres that gradually release vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). The complete scaffold and five partial scaffolds were implanted in bilateral mandibular body defects in eight beagles. The scaffolds were examined histologically and morphometrically 8 weeks after implantation. Histologic staining of the decalcified scaffolds demonstrated that bone formation was greatest in the VEGF/MSC scaffold (63.42 ± 1.67), followed by the VEGF/MSC/EPC (47.8 ± 1.87) and MSC/EPC (45.21 ± 1.6) scaffolds, the MSC scaffold (34.59 ± 1.49), the VEGF scaffold (20.03 ± 1.29), and the untreated scaffold (7.24 ± 0.08). Hence, the rate of new bone regeneration was highest in scaffolds containing MSC, either mixed with EPC or incorporating VEGF. Adding both EPC and VEGF with the MSC was not necessary. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 105B: 1767–1777, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.