Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Efficacy and Safety of Ibrutinib in Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Publisher Pubmed



Roufarshbaf M1 ; Javeri M2 ; Akbari V3 ; Matin PH2 ; Farrokhi P4 ; Sadeghi E5 ; Heidari Z6 ; Moghaddas A2
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Student Research Committee, Faculty of Pharmacy, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
  5. 5. Research Consultation Center (RCC), Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
  6. 6. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: DARU, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Published:2022


Abstract

Objectives: Since the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved ibrutinib to treat patients with refractory/relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (R/R MCL), it is used in clinical trials, whether as a single agent or in combination with other chemotherapy agents. The efficacy and safety of ibrutinib administration alone or in combinations have not been studied systematically. This study systematically reviewed the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib-containing regimens for the treatment of patients with MCL. Evidence acquisition: We performed a systematic search in PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus. Then, a team of independent reviewers selected relevant studies and extracted the data. Results: From a total of 1,436 studies, 12 trials were eligible. The overall response rates (ORRs) of patients with R/R MCL receiving single-agent ibrutinib ranged between 62.7% to 93.8%, and the ORRs of ibrutinib combinations ranged from 74 to 88%. In patients with newly diagnosed MCL receiving ibrutinib and rituximab, ORR ranged from 84 to 100%. The highest progression-free survival (PFS) was reported in patients receiving ibrutinib and rituximab (43 months). The meta-analysis performed on adverse events (AEs) demonstrated that single-agent ibrutinib had a high risk of bleeding, nausea, and diarrhea. Conclusion: Single-agent ibrutinib showed acceptable efficacy and safety in the treatment of patients with MCL. Moreover, combining ibrutinib with other agents such as rituximab, venetoclax, and ublituximab can increase its efficacy and reduce chemotherapy-induced resistance in most cases; however, in the case of combination therapy, patients need to be monitored more strictly in terms of AEs. In our review, the ibrutinib and rituximab combination showed promising results in patients with R/R MCL. Also, this combination showed favorable efficacy and safety in patients with newly diagnosed untreated MCL, making it a great candidate to be studied more in large and well-designed trials. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Other Related Docs
18. How to Write a Systematic Review: A Narrative Review, International Journal of Preventive Medicine (2021)