Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Women-Only Cardiac Rehabilitation Delivery Around the World Publisher Pubmed



Turkadawi K1 ; Supervia M2, 3 ; Lopezjimenez F3 ; Adawi A4 ; Sadeghi M5 ; Grace SL4, 6
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. College of Health Sciences, QU Health, Qatar University, Al Jamiaa St, Doha, Qatar
  2. 2. Gregorio Maranon General University Hospital, Gregorio Maranon Health Research Institute, Dr. Esquerdo, Madrid, Spain
  3. 3. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
  4. 4. York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
  5. 5. Cardiac Rehabilitation Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  6. 6. KITE-University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Source: Heart Lung and Circulation Published:2021


Abstract

Background: Women utilise cardiac rehabilitation (CR) significantly less than men. Gender-tailored CR improves adherence and mental health outcomes when compared to traditional programs. This study ascertained the availability of women-only (W-O) CR classes globally. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, an online survey was administered to CR programs globally, assessing delivery of W-O classes, among other program characteristics. Univariate tests were performed to compare provision of W-O CR by program characteristics. Results: Data were collected in 93/111 countries with CR (83.8% country response rate); 1,082 surveys (32.1% program response rate) were initiated. Globally, 38 (40.9%; range 1.2–100% of programs/country) countries and 110 (11.8%) programs offered W-O CR. Women-Only CR was offered in 55 (7.4%) programs in high-income countries, versus 55 (16.4%) programs in low- and middle-income countries (p<0.001); it was offered most commonly in the Eastern Mediterranean region (n=5, 55.6%; p=0.22). Programs that offered W-O CR were more often located in an academic or tertiary facility, served more patients/year, offered more components, treated more patients/session, offered alternative forms of exercise, had more staff (including cardiologists, dietitians, and administrative assistants, but not mental health care professionals), and perceived space and human resources to be less of a barrier to delivery than programs not offering W-O CR (all p<0.05). Conclusion: Women-Only CR was not commonly offered. Only larger, well-resourced programs seem to have the capacity to offer it, so expanding delivery may require exploiting low-cost, less human resource-intensive approaches such as online peer support. © 2020 Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ)
Other Related Docs
13. Cardiac Rehabilitation Costs, International Journal of Cardiology (2017)
33. Global Availability of Cardiac Rehabilitation, Nature Reviews Cardiology (2014)