Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Availability and Delivery of Cardiac Rehabilitation in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: How Does It Compare Globally? Publisher Pubmed



Turkadawi K1 ; Supervia M2, 3 ; Pesah E4 ; Lopezjimenez F3 ; Afaneh J1, 5 ; Elheneidy A6 ; Sadeghi M7 ; Sarrafzadegan N8, 9 ; Alhashemi M10 ; Papasavvas T10 ; Grace SL4, 11
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Qatar University, Al Jamiaa St, Doha, Qatar
  2. 2. Gregorio Maranon General University Hospital, Gregorio Maranon Health Research Institute, Dr. Esquerdo, 46, Madrid, 28007, Spain
  3. 3. Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, 55905, MN, United States
  4. 4. York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, M3J1P3, Ontario, Canada
  5. 5. Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
  6. 6. Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  7. 7. Cardiac Rehabilitation Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  8. 8. Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  9. 9. University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, V6T, BC, Canada
  10. 10. Cardiac Rehabilitation, Heart Hospital, Doha, Qatar
  11. 11. Toronto Rehabilitation Institute (KITE), University Health Network, University of Toronto, 399 Bathurst St, Toronto, M5T 2S8, ON, Canada

Source: International Journal of Cardiology Published:2019


Abstract

Background: This study aimed to (1) confirm cardiac rehabilitation (CR) availability, (2) establish CR density and unmet need, as well as (3) the nature of programs in the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR), and (4) compare these (a) by EMR country and (b) to other countries. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a survey was administered to CR programs globally. Cardiac associations and local champions facilitated program identification. CR need was based on Global Burden of Disease study ischemic heart disease (IHD) estimates. Results: Of the 22 EMR countries, CR programs were identified in 12 (54.5%). Nine (75.0% country response rate) countries participated, and 24/49 (49.0% program response rate) surveys were initiated. There was 1 CR spot for every 104 incident IHD patients/year (versus 12 globally). One-third of responding programs were privately funded (n = 8; versus globally p <.001), and in 18 (75.0%) programs patients paid some or all of the cost out-of-pocket (versus n = 378, 36.3% globally; p <.001). Over 80% of programs accepted guideline-indicated patients. Nurses (n = 20, 95.2%), cardiologists (n = 18, 85.7%) and dietitians (n = 18, 85.7%) were the most common healthcare providers on CR teams (mean = 6.4 ± 2.2/program; 5.9 ± 2.8 globally, p =.18). On average, programs offered 8.9 ± 1.7/11 core components (versus 8.7 ± 1.9 globally, p =.90). These were most commonly initial assessment, management of risk factors, and patient education (n = 21, 100.0% for each), and least commonly return-to-work counselling (n = 15 71.4%). Mean dose was 27.0 ± 13.5 sessions (versus 28.7 ± 27.6 globally, p =.38). Seven (33.3%) programs offered some alternative models. Conclusion: CR is insufficiently implemented, with 2,079,283 more spots needed/year across the EMR. But where offered, CR is consistent with guidelines. © 2019 Elsevier B.V.
Other Related Docs