Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Promoting Patient Utilization of Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Joint International Council and Canadian Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation Position Statement Publisher Pubmed



Santiago De Araujo Pio C1 ; Beckie TM2 ; Varnfield M3 ; Sarrafzadegan N4, 5 ; Babu AS6 ; Baidya S7 ; Buckley J8 ; Chen SY9, 10 ; Gagliardi A11 ; Heine M12 ; Khiong JS13 ; Mola A14 ; Radi B15 ; Supervia M16, 17 Show All Authors
Authors
  1. Santiago De Araujo Pio C1
  2. Beckie TM2
  3. Varnfield M3
  4. Sarrafzadegan N4, 5
  5. Babu AS6
  6. Baidya S7
  7. Buckley J8
  8. Chen SY9, 10
  9. Gagliardi A11
  10. Heine M12
  11. Khiong JS13
  12. Mola A14
  13. Radi B15
  14. Supervia M16, 17
  15. Trani MR18
  16. Abreu A19, 20
  17. Sawdon JA21
  18. Moffatt PD22
  19. Grace SL1, 23
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. School of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Canada
  2. 2. College of Nursing, University of South Florida, Tampa, United States
  3. 3. Australian eHealth Research Centre, CSIRO, and Australian Cardiovascular Health and Rehabilitation Association (ACRA), Australia
  4. 4. Faculty of Medicine, School of Population and Public Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
  5. 5. Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  6. 6. Department of Physiotherapy, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
  7. 7. Department of Physiotherapy, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Kathmandu University, Dhulikhel Hospital, Dhulikhel, Nepal
  8. 8. Centre for Active Living, University Centre Shrewsbury, Shrewsbury, United Kingdom
  9. 9. Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital and School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
  10. 10. Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
  11. 11. Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
  12. 12. Institute of Sport and Exercise Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
  13. 13. Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Hospital, Brunei Darussalam
  14. 14. Rehabilitation Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York City, NY, United States
  15. 15. National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita, Jakarta, Indonesia
  16. 16. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Gregorio Maranon General University Hospital, Gregorio Maranon Health Research Institute, Dr. Esquerdo, 46, Madrid, 28007, Spain
  17. 17. Division of Preventive Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, MN, United States
  18. 18. Council of Cardiac Rehabilitation and Sports Cardiology, Philippine Heart Association, Pasig City, Philippines and Section of Cardiology, Chong Hua Hospital Heart Institute, Cebu City, Philippines
  19. 19. Cardiology Department, Hospital Santa Maria, CHLN, Lisbon, Portugal
  20. 20. Medical School of University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
  21. 21. Public Education and Special Projects, Cardiac Health Foundation of Canada, Toronto, Canada
  22. 22. Patient Partner Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
  23. 23. KITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Canada

Source: International Journal of Cardiology Published:2020


Abstract

Background: Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) is a recommendation in international clinical practice guidelines given its' benefits, however use is suboptimal. The purpose of this position statement was to translate evidence on interventions that increase CR enrolment and adherence into implementable recommendations. Methods: The writing panel was constituted by representatives of societies internationally concerned with preventive cardiology, and included disciplines that would be implementing the recommendations. Patient partners served, as well as policy-makers. The statement was developed in accordance with AGREE II, among other guideline checklists. Recommendations were based on our update of the Cochrane review on interventions to promote patient utilization of CR. These were circulated to panel members, who were asked to rate each on a 7-point Likert scale in terms of scientific acceptability, actionability, and feasibility of assessment. A web call was convened to achieve consensus and confirm strength of the recommendations (based on GRADE). The draft underwent external review and public comment. Results: The 3 drafted recommendations were that to increase enrolment, healthcare providers, particularly nurses (strong), should promote CR to patients face-to-face (strong), and that to increase adherence part of CR could be delivered remotely (weak). Ratings for the 3 recommendations were 5.95 ± 0.69 (mean ± standard deviation), 5.33 ± 1.12 and 5.64 ± 1.08, respectively. Conclusions: Interventions can significantly increase utilization of CR, and hence should be widely applied. We call upon cardiac care institutions to implement these strategies to augment CR utilization, and to ensure CR programs are adequately resourced to serve enrolling patients and support them to complete programs. © 2019
Other Related Docs