Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Prevalence of Return to Work in Cardiovascular Patients After Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Publisher Pubmed



Sadeghi M1 ; Rahiminam H2 ; Amerizadeh A2 ; Masoumi G3 ; Heidari R4 ; Shahabi J5 ; Mansouri M4 ; Roohafza H4
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Cardiac Rehabilitation Research Center, Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Heart Failure Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  3. 3. Anesthesiology Department, Chamran Cardiovascular Medical and Research Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  4. 4. Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  5. 5. Interventional Cardiology Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: Current Problems in Cardiology Published:2022


Abstract

The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to clarify the effects of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on the prevalence of return to work (RTW) in cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) patients. CR plays a very important role in the management of CVDs and improves the patients' physical activity, quality of life, and a decrease in the cost of healthcare. RTW is the most important goal in the rehabilitation of CVD patients. PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google scholar were searched systematically from inception up to January 2021 for English published clinical trials and observational studies. In total, 16 studies were analyzed, of them, 8 were controlled studies. Pooled results showed that the mean age of patients was 52.30 (50.04, 54.57). The prevalence of RTW in the CR attending group was 66% (60%, 71%) and in the control group was 58% (47%, 68%). Subgroup analysis showed that the proportion of RTW was higher in white-collars 76% (73%-79%) compared to. blue-collars 63% (56%-70%). Out-patient CR with 72% (61%-81%) RTW was more effective compared to in-patient CR with 62% (44%- 78%) and usual care (control). It can be concluded that CR especially out-patient CR increases the prevalence of RTW but not much. Improved and appropriate CR programs related to each individual's disease and patient condition which follow the valid guidelines might help to increase the effectiveness of CR in terms of RTW. © 2021 Elsevier Inc.
Other Related Docs