Investigation of the Causal Relationship of Saturated Fat Acids on Heart Stroke: Evidence From Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Publisher



D Habibi DANIAL ; I Hamraz IMAN ; F Teymoori FARSHAD ; Ah Saeidian Amir HESAM ; H Mirtavoosmahyari HANIFEH ; Q Kasnavi QUMARS ; A Soleymani Taloubaghi ALIREZA ; H Masoudi HOMAYOON ; F Azizi FEREIDOUN ; Ms Daneshpour Maryam SADAT
Source: BMC Nutrition Published:2025

Abstract

Background/Aim: We conducted the Mendelian Randomization (MR) analysis to investigate the causal relationship between serum saturated fatty acids (SFAs) and the risk of heart stroke (HS). Methods: The MRC-IEU Consortium provided summary statistics datasets related to SFAs, encompassing 64,979 individuals of European descent. Genetic variants associated with HF were identified using a GWAS dataset comprising 461,880 participants (cases = 7,055, controls = 454,825) of European descent from the UK Biobank. Generalized summary Mendelian Randomization (GSMR) assessed the potential association. Additionally, we performed a two-sample Mendelian Randomization (TSMR). The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was indicated. Results: The GSMR results suggested no significant between SFA and HS [OR = 1.002, 95% CI: 0.995, 1.009; P-value = 0.752]. TSMR revealed [ORIVW = 1.005, 95% CI: 0.998, 1.012; P-value = 0.169]. MR Egger (Q = 6.14, Q_pvalue = 0.292), IVW (Q = 6.24, Q_pvalue = 0.396; I2 = 18.7%) for heterogeneity test, and Egger intercept = 1.14 × e-4, p-value = 0.792 for pleiotropy test were performed. These findings remained consistent across various Mendelian Randomization methods, including IVW [OR = 1.005, 95% CI: 0.99–1.01, p-value = 0.169], Simple median [OR = 1.009, 95% CI: 0.99–1.02, p-value = 0.08], MR-Egger [OR = 1.001, 95% CI: 0.97–1.03, p-value = 0.97], Robust Adjusted Profile Score [OR = 1.005, 95% CI: 0.99–1.01, p-value = 0.167], MR-Lasso [OR = 1.005, 95% CI: 0.99–1.01, p-value = 0.169], Constrained maximum likelihood (MR-cML) [OR = 1.006, 95% CI: 0.99–1.01, p-value = 0.168], Weighted mode [OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.99–1.02, p-value = 0.279], Maximum-likelihood method [OR = 1.005, 95% CI: 0.99–1.01, p-value = 0.158]. Conclusion: Our MR study did not yield convincing evidence supporting the association of SFAs with HF risk. Future studies should focus on alternative approaches to investigate this association. © 2025 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.