Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Dosiomics-Based Detection of Dose Distribution Variations in Helical Tomotherapy for Prostate Cancer Patients: Influence of Treatment Plan Parameters Publisher Pubmed



Mirzaeiyan M1, 2 ; Akhavan A3 ; Hemati S3 ; Etehadtavakol M1 ; Amouheidari A4 ; Adibi A5 ; Khanahmad H6 ; Sharifonnasabi Z7 ; Shokrani P1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  4. 4. Isfahan Milad Hospital, Isfahan, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  6. 6. Department of Genetics and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  7. 7. Department of Statistics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

Source: Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine Published:2024


Abstract

The stability of dosiomics features (DFs) and dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters for detecting disparities in helical tomotherapy planned dose distributions was assessed. Treatment plans of 18 prostate patients were recalculated using the followings: field width (WF) (2.5 vs. 5), pitch factor (PF) (0.433 vs. 0.444), and modulation factor (MF) (2.5 vs. 3). From each of the eight plans per patient, ninety-three original and 744 wavelet-based DFs were extracted, using 3D-Slicer software, across six regions including: target volume (PTV), pelvic lymph nodes (PTV-LN), PTV + PTV-LN (PTV-All), one cm rind around PTV-All (PTV-Ring), rectum, and bladder. For the resulting DFs and DVH parameters, the coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated, and using hierarchical clustering, the features were classified into low/high variability. The significance of parameters on instability was analyzed by a three-way analysis of variance. All DF’s were stable in PTV, PTV-LN, and PTV-Ring (average CV (CV¯) ≤ 0.36). Only one feature in the bladder (CV¯ = 0.9), rectum (CV¯ = 0.4), and PTV-All (CV¯ = 0.37) were considered unstable due to change in MF in the bladder and WF in the PTV-All. The value of CV¯ for the wavelet features was much higher than that for the original features. Out of 225 unstable wavelet features, 84 features had CV¯ ≥ 1. The CVs for all the DVHs remained very small (CV¯< 0.06). This study highlights that the sensitivity of DFs to changes in tomotherapy planning parameters is influenced by the region and the DFs, particularly wavelet features, surpassing the effectiveness of DVHs. © Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine 2024.
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs