Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
A Comparative Planning Study on the Treatment of Gastric Cancer Patients With Tomotherapy, Coplanar and Non-Coplanar Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy (3D-Crt) Publisher



Kazemzadeh A1 ; Mahani L2 ; Kianinia M2 ; Shanei A1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Radio-Oncology, Seyed-Al-Shohada Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: International Journal of Radiation Research Published:2024


Abstract

Background: The main purpose of this study is to investigate different methods of radiotherapy (RT) using coplanar three-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT (cp)), non-coplanar 3D-CRT RT (3D-CRT (ncp)) and helical tomotherapy (HT) techniques to find the optimal method to treat gastric cancer patients. Materials and Methods: Twenty patients with gastric cancer were retrospectively enrolled. Three different treatment plans including HT, 3D-CRT (cp) and 3D-CRT (ncp) were generated and optimized for each patient. All plans were then evaluated with respect to dosimetric parameters exported from dose-volume histogram curves of target and organ-at-risk (OAR). SPSS software was used for statistical analysis. Results: The conformity index in the target was similar for all plans (p > 0.05), but HT showed significantly better homogeneity compared to the two 3D-CRT methods (p-value < 0.05). Compared to the 3D-CRT (cp) and 3D-CRT (ncp) plans, the HT plans significantly reduced the mean dose, V13 and V20 values of the kidneys (p-Value < 0.05); V5 values of both kidneys were lower in the 3D-CRT (ncp) plan compared to 3D-CRT (cp) and HT. The difference was statistically significant. Moreover, the results proved that the 3D-CRT (ncp) could better preserve kidneys rather than 3D-CRT (cp). Dmean of the liver for HT plans (20.03) was significantly higher than those for both coplanar and non-coplanar 3D-CRT plans (17.86 and 17.7, respectively). Conclusion: Generally, HT plans appear to be the best, but in the case of selecting an optimum method, it is necessary to pay attention to the location of tumors compared to OARs. © 2024 Novin Medical Radiation Institute. All rights reserved.
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
16. Optimization of Ct Slice Thickness in 3D-Crt and Imrt Planning of Low Grade Glioma, International Journal of Radiation Research (2021)
18. Secondary Cancer Risk After Radiotherapy of Seminoma Stage One, Iranian Journal of Medical Physics (2022)
30. Melatonin for Gastric Cancer Treatment: Where Do We Stand?, Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology (2025)
33. Iranian Women Diagnosed With Breast Cancer a Decade Earlier Than British Women?, Journal of Kerman University of Medical Sciences (2022)