Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Leveraging Functional Genomic Annotations and Genome Coverage to Improve Polygenic Prediction of Complex Traits Within and Between Ancestries Publisher Pubmed



Zheng Z1, 2, 3 ; Liu S1 ; Sidorenko J1 ; Wang Y1 ; Lin T1 ; Yengo L1 ; Turley P4, 5 ; Ani A6, 7 ; Wang R6 ; Nolte IM6 ; Snieder H6 ; Wijmenga C14 ; Vonk JM6 ; Swertz MA14 Show All Authors
Authors
  1. Zheng Z1, 2, 3
  2. Liu S1
  3. Sidorenko J1
  4. Wang Y1
  5. Lin T1
  6. Yengo L1
  7. Turley P4, 5
  8. Ani A6, 7
  9. Wang R6
  10. Nolte IM6
  11. Snieder H6
  12. Wijmenga C14
  13. Vonk JM6
  14. Swertz MA14
  15. Sanna S14
  16. Lopera Maya EA14
  17. Kuivenhoven JA15
  18. Franke L14
  19. Deelen P14
  20. Aguirregamboa R14
  21. Yang J8, 9
  22. Wray NR1, 10
  23. Goddard ME11, 12
  24. Visscher PM1, 13
  25. Zeng J1
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
  2. 2. Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, United States
  3. 3. Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, United States
  4. 4. Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
  5. 5. Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
  6. 6. Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
  7. 7. Department of Bioinformatics, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  8. 8. School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China
  9. 9. Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China
  10. 10. Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  11. 11. Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
  12. 12. Biosciences Research Division, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
  13. 13. Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  14. 14. Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
  15. 15. Department of Pediatrics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands

Source: Nature Genetics Published:2024


Abstract

We develop a method, SBayesRC, that integrates genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics with functional genomic annotations to improve polygenic prediction of complex traits. Our method is scalable to whole-genome variant analysis and refines signals from functional annotations by allowing them to affect both causal variant probability and causal effect distribution. We analyze 50 complex traits and diseases using ∼7 million common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and 96 annotations. SBayesRC improves prediction accuracy by 14% in European ancestry and up to 34% in cross-ancestry prediction compared to the baseline method SBayesR, which does not use annotations, and outperforms other methods, including LDpred2, LDpred-funct, MegaPRS, PolyPred-S and PRS-CSx. Investigation of factors affecting prediction accuracy identifies a significant interaction between SNP density and annotation information, suggesting whole-genome sequence variants with annotations may further improve prediction. Functional partitioning analysis highlights a major contribution of evolutionary constrained regions to prediction accuracy and the largest per-SNP contribution from nonsynonymous SNPs. © The Author(s) 2024.
Other Related Docs