Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Epidemiological Challenges in the Study of Behavioral Addictions: A Call for High Standard Methodologies Publisher



Rumpf HJ1 ; Brandt D1 ; Demetrovics Z2 ; Billieux J3 ; Carragher N4, 20 ; Brand M5 ; Bowdenjones H6 ; Rahimimovaghar A7 ; Assanangkornchai S8 ; Glavaktkalic R9 ; Borges G10 ; Lee HK11 ; Rehbein F12 ; Fineberg NA13 Show All Authors
Authors
  1. Rumpf HJ1
  2. Brandt D1
  3. Demetrovics Z2
  4. Billieux J3
  5. Carragher N4, 20
  6. Brand M5
  7. Bowdenjones H6
  8. Rahimimovaghar A7
  9. Assanangkornchai S8
  10. Glavaktkalic R9
  11. Borges G10
  12. Lee HK11
  13. Rehbein F12
  14. Fineberg NA13
  15. Mann K14
  16. Potenza MN15
  17. Stein DJ16
  18. Higuchi S17
  19. King D18
  20. Saunders JB19
  21. Poznyak V4, 20
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Center for Integrative Psychiatry, Research Group S:TEP, University of Lubeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Lubeck, 23562, Germany
  2. 2. Institute of Psychology, ELTE Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest, Hungary
  3. 3. Addictive and Compulsive Behaviours Laboratory, Institute for Health and Behaviour, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
  4. 4. Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, WHO Headquarters, Geneva, Switzerland
  5. 5. General Psychology: Cognition and Center for Behavioral Addiction Research (CeBAR), University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
  6. 6. Central North West London NHS Trust and Division of Brain Science, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
  7. 7. Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  8. 8. Epidemiology Unit and Centre for Alcohol Studies (INCAS), Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand
  9. 9. Institute of Social Sciences Ivo Pilar, Zagreb, Croatia
  10. 10. National Institute of Psychiatry, Mexico City, Mexico
  11. 11. Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
  12. 12. Criminological Research Institute Lower Saxony, Hannover, Germany
  13. 13. University of Hertfordshire, University of Cambridge, and Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Hatfield, United Kingdom
  14. 14. Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
  15. 15. Departments of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, and the Connecticut Council on Problem Gambling and Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, United States
  16. 16. Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, SA MRC Unit on Risk & Resilience in Mental Disorders, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
  17. 17. National Hospital Organization Kurihama Medical and Addiction Center, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan
  18. 18. School of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
  19. 19. Centre for Youth Substance Abuse Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
  20. 20. Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, WHO Headquarters, Geneva, Switzerland

Source: Current Addiction Reports Published:2019


Abstract

Purpose of Review: The 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) categorizes gambling disorder in the section on substance-related and addictive disorders, and the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) includes both gambling and gaming disorder as disorders due to addictive behaviors. However, there is less evidence for other putative behavioral addictions. This review focuses on requirements for epidemiological studies of disorders that may be considered as behavioral addictions and compares the current state of research with principles of sound epidemiological research. Recent Findings: In studies of behavioral addictions, samples are often quite small, which may lead to increased random error. The lack of sound assessment tools—particularly the lack of agreed-upon diagnostic criteria and standardized diagnostic interviews—may also increase systematic error. Other concerns related to systematic bias include the use of convenience samples, lack of pro-active recruitment, inadequate assessment of confounding variables, and a dearth of representative and longitudinal studies. Summary: This review recommends that future studies of putative behavioral addictions should more closely adhere to methodological standards of epidemiological research to reduce random and systematic error. Specific recommendations are detailed to advance epidemiological research in this area with the aim of improving the evidence base and generating more refined public health recommendations and policies. © 2019, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.