Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Long-Term Results of an Accelerated Corneal Cross-Linking Protocol (18 Mw/Cm2) for the Treatment of Progressive Keratoconus Publisher Pubmed



Hashemi H1 ; Miraftab M1 ; Seyedian MA1 ; Hafezi F2, 3, 4, 5 ; Bahrmandy H1 ; Heidarian S1 ; Amanzadeh K1 ; Nikbin H1 ; Fotouhi A6 ; Asgari S1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Noor Ophthalmology Research Center, Noor Eye Hospital, No. 96 Esfandiar Blvd, Valiasr Ave, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Center for Applied Biotechnology and Molecular Medicine (CABMM), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  3. 3. Medical Faculty, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
  4. 4. Eye Care and Laboratory Research, Zurich, Switzerland
  5. 5. Department of Ophthalmology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
  6. 6. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: American Journal of Ophthalmology Published:2015


Abstract

Purpose To compare the long-term outcomes of accelerated and standard corneal cross-linking protocols in the treatment of progressive keratoconus. Design Prospective randomized clinical trial. Methods Thirty-one eyes with keratoconus were treated with an accelerated protocol (18 mW/cm2, 5 min) and all contralateral eyes were treated with the standard method (3 mW/cm2, 30 min) using the same overall fluence of 5.4 J/cm2. Results At 18 months after the procedure, the standard group showed significant improvement in spherical equivalent (P <.05), K-readings (P <.05), Q value (P <.05), index of surface variance (P <.05), and keratoconus index (P =.008) and decline in central corneal thickness (P <.05), but no significant change in visual acuity, corneal hysteresis, corneal resistance factor, P2 area, or endothelial cell density. In the accelerated group, central corneal thickness was the only parameter with statistically significant change. However, neither of these parameters showed significant differences between the standard and the 18 mW/cm2 accelerated protocol, except K-reading (P =.059) and index surface variance (P =.034). Conclusion An accelerated cross-linking protocol, using 18 mW/cm2 for 5 minutes, shows a comparable outcome and safety profile when compared to the standard protocol, but better corneal flattening is achieved with the standard method than the accelerated method. Overall, both methods stop the disease progression similarly. This study will continue to examine more long-term results. © 2015 Elsevier Inc.
Other Related Docs
12. Updates on Managements for Keratoconus, Journal of Current Ophthalmology (2018)
15. Accelerated Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking in Pediatric Keratoconus, Journal of Current Ophthalmology (2021)
20. Conventional Versus Accelerated Versus Customized Corneal Cross-Linking, Keratoconus: Optical and Surgical Management (2024)
25. Corneal Cross-Linking Treatment of Keratoconus, Oman Journal of Ophthalmology (2015)