Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share By
Corrigendum to “The Association Between High Oral Intake of Acrylamide and Risk of Breast Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis” [Trends in Food Science & Technology Volume 100, June 2020, Pages 155–163] (Trends in Food Science & Technology (2020) 100 (155–163), (S0924224420304350), (10.1016/J.Tifs.2020.04.006)) Publisher



Atabati H1 ; Abouhamzeh B2 ; Abdollahifar MA3 ; Javadinia SS4 ; Gharibianbajestanie S5 ; Atamaleki A6 ; Raoofi A4 ; Fakhri Y6 ; Oliveira CAF7 ; Khaneghah AM8
Authors

Source: Trends in Food Science and Technology Published:2021


Abstract

Additionally, no significance RRs of breast cancer risk with high oral intake acrylamide in the BMI lower than 25 kg/m2 (RR = 0.93; 95%CI:0.83–1.02) and BMI equal and higher than 25 kg/m 2 (RR = 0.97; 95%CI: 0.91–1.03) was observed (Fig. 5).; Hogervorst, J. G., Schouten, L. J., Konings, E. J., Goldbohm, R. A., & van den Brandt, P. A.(2007a). A prospective study of dietary acrylamide intake and the risk of endometrial, ovarian, and breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 16, 2304–2313. Hogervorst, J. G., Schouten, L. J., Konings, E. J., Goldbohm, R. A., & van den Brandt, P. A.(2007b). A prospective study of dietary acrylamide intake and the risk of endometrial, ovarian, and breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers, 16, 2304, 2313; Hogervorst, J. G., Schouten, L. J., Konings, E. J., Goldbohm, R. A., & van den Brandt, P. A. (2007). A Prospective Study of Dietary Acrylamide Intake and the Risk of Endometrial, Ovarian, and Breast Cancer. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, 16, 2304-2313.; Additionally, no significance RRs of breast cancer risk with high oral intake acrylamide in the BMI lower than 12 kg/m2 (RR = 0.93; 95%CI:0.83–1.02) and BMI equal and higher than 12 kg/m 2 (RR = 0.97; 95%CI: 0.91–1.03) was observed (Fig. 5).; The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused.; Moreover, no significant difference among RRs in body mass index (BMI) status subgroups (BMI < 12 kg/m2 (0.93; 95%CI: 0.83–1.02) and BMI ≥12 kg/m2 (0.97; 95%CI: 0.91–1.03) and coffee consumption (0.96; 95%CI: 0.84–1.09)) were noted.; “Moreover, no significant difference among RRs in body mass index (BMI) status subgroups (BMI < 25 Kg/m2 (0.93; 95%CI: 0.83–1.02) and BMI ≥25 kg/m2 (0.97; 95%CI: 0.91–1.03) and coffee consumption (0.96; 95%CI: 0.84–1.09)) were noted.” © 2020 Elsevier Ltd
Other Related Docs