Facial Prosthesis: Conventional Methods Versus 3D Concepts

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):

Share By

Facial Prosthesis: Conventional Methods Versus 3D Concepts Publisher

Yousefi P¹ ; Yeganeh F² ; Cheshmi B³ ; Keyhan SO^{4, 5} ; Azari A⁶ ; Mosharraf R⁷

Source: Integrated Procedures in Facial Cosmetic Surgery Published:2021

Abstract

Aging is naturally associated with spontaneous deterioration of health. In addition to the disability and defect associated with diseases that increase with age, traffic collisions and occupational accidents are also among the contributing factors. Since maxillofacial deformities are located in the facial area, they often embarrass patients and subsequently affect their physical and mental health and even those close to them. Maxillofacial prosthetics is a branch of prosthodontics specializing in the repair of facial hard and soft tissue defects, with the goal of restoring the function and aesthetics of the area. The overall goal of maxillofacial prosthetic is to treat and restore facial defects in terms of function and aesthetics in order to improve self-esteem as well as the quality of life of individuals. © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021.

Related Docs

View other Related Docs

1. Dental Implant-Retained Auricular Prosthesis, Dental Research Journal (2018)

2. Correction of Tear Trough Deformity With Minced Orbital Fat Grafts During Transconjunctival Lower Blepharoplasty, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (2024)

3. Deep Learning Applications in Prosthodontics: A Systematic Review, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (2025)

Experts (# of related papers)

View all Related Experts

Farahnaz Nejatidanesh (2)

Omid Savabi (2)

Other Related Docs

4. Interim Restorations in Implant Dentistry: Basic Considerations and Techniques, Dental Implantation and Technology (2009)

5. Nasal Reconstruction Due to Basal-Cell Carcinoma Using Dental Implants: A Case Report, Dental Hypotheses (2022)

6. Facial Cosmetic Surgery in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Past, Present, and Future, Integrated Procedures in Facial Cosmetic Surgery (2021)

7. The Anterior Palate As a Donor Site in Maxillofacial Bone Grafting: A Quantitative Anatomic Study, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (2005)

8. Effect of Implants on Maximum Bite Force in Edentulous Patients., The Journal of oral implantology (2009)

9. Mandibular Angle Augmentation, Integrated Procedures in Facial Cosmetic Surgery (2021)

10. Functional Treatment of Skeletal Class Ii Malocclusion Using Bone-Anchored Devices and Intermaxillary Elastics, Dental Hypotheses (2015)

11. Finite Element Method Analysis of Stress Distribution to Supporting Tissues in a Class Iv Aramany Removable Partial Denture (Part Ii: Bone and Mucosal Membrane), Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (2008)

12. Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty, Integrated Procedures in Facial Cosmetic Surgery (2021)

13. Interim Restorations in Implant Dentistry: Basic Considerations and Techniques, Dental Implantation and Technology (2010)

14. Impact of Orthognathic Surgery on Quality of Life in Patients With Dentofacial Deformities, International Journal of Dentistry (2017)

15. Paranasal, Malar, and Submalar Augmentation Using Implants, Integrated Procedures in Facial Cosmetic Surgery (2021)

16. Reconstruction of Natural Smile and Splinting With Natural Tooth Pontic Fiber-Reinforced Composite Bridge, Case Reports in Dentistry (2022)

17. The Association Between Blood Groups and Maxillofacial Deformities, Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery (2008)

18. Treatment Options for Oral Rehabilitation of the Atrophic Maxilla: A Literature Review, Avicenna Journal of Dental Research (2023)

Style	Citing Format
MLA	Yousefi P, et al.. "Facial Prosthesis: Conventional Methods Versus 3D Concepts." Integrated Procedures in Facial Cosmetic Surgery, vol. , no. , 2021, pp. 209-219.
APA	Yousefi P, Yeganeh F, Cheshmi B, Keyhan SO, Azari A, Mosharraf R (2021). Facial Prosthesis: Conventional Methods Versus 3D Concepts. Integrated Procedures in Facial Cosmetic Surgery, (), 209-219.
Chicago	Yousefi P, Yeganeh F, Cheshmi B, Keyhan SO, Azari A, Mosharraf R. "Facial Prosthesis: Conventional Methods Versus 3D Concepts." Integrated Procedures in Facial Cosmetic Surgery , no. (2021): 209-219.
Harvard	Yousefi P et al. (2021) 'Facial Prosthesis: Conventional Methods Versus 3D Concepts', Integrated Procedures in Facial Cosmetic Surgery, (), pp. 209-219.
Vancouver	Yousefi P, Yeganeh F, Cheshmi B, Keyhan SO, Azari A, Mosharraf R. Facial Prosthesis: Conventional Methods Versus 3D Concepts. Integrated Procedures in Facial Cosmetic Surgery. 2021;():209-219.
BibTex	@article{ author = {Yousefi P and Yeganeh F and Cheshmi B and Keyhan SO and Azari A and Mosharraf R}, title = {Facial Prosthesis: Conventional Methods Versus 3D Concepts}, journal = {Integrated Procedures in Facial Cosmetic Surgery}, volume = {}, number = {}, pages = {209-219}, year = {2021} }
RIS	TY - JOUR AU - Yousefi P AU - Yeganeh F AU - Cheshmi B AU - Keyhan SO AU - Azari A AU - Mosharraf R TI - Facial Prosthesis: Conventional Methods Versus 3D Concepts JO - Integrated Procedures in Facial Cosmetic Surgery VL - IS - SP - 209 EP - 219 PY - 2021 ER -

Science Communicator Platform

Authors

Abstract