Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Effect of Different Impression Materials and Techniques on the Dimensional Accuracy of Implant Definitive Casts



Ebadian B1 ; Rismanchian M1 ; Dastgheib B2 ; Bajoghli F1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Dental Implant Research Center, Department of Prosthodontics, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Torabinejad Dental Research Center, Department of Prosthodontics, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: Dental Research Journal Published:2015

Abstract

Background: Different factors such as impression techniques and materials can affect the passive fit between the superstructure and implant. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of different impression materials and techniques on the dimensional accuracy of implant definitive casts. Materials and Methods: Four internal hex implants (Biohorizons Ψ4 mm) were placed on a metal maxillary model perpendicular to the horizontal plane in maxillary lateral incisors, right canine and left first premolar areas. Three impression techniques including open tray, closed tray using ball top screw abutments and closed tray using short impression copings and two impression materials (polyether and polyvinyl siloxane) were evaluated (n = 60). The changes in distances between implant analogues in mediolateral (x) and anteroposterior (y) directions and analogue angles in x/z and y/z directions in the horizontal plane on the definitive casts were measured by coordinate measuring machine. The data were analyzed by multivariate two-way analysis of variance and one sample t-test (α = 0.05). Results: No statistical significant differences were observed between different impression techniques and materials. However, deviation and distortion of definitive casts had a significant difference with the master model when short impression copings and polyvinyl siloxane impression material were used (P < 0.05). In open tray technique, there was a significant difference in the rotation of analogs compared with the master model with both impression materials (P < 0.05). Conclusion: There was no difference between open and closed tray impression techniques; however, less distortion and deviation were observed in the open tray technique. In the closed tray impression technique, ball top screw was more accurate than short impression copings.
Other Related Docs
14. Bone Loss-Related Factors in Tissue and Bone Level Dental Implants: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials, Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (2021)
37. Buckling Analysis of a Functionally Graded Implant Model for Treatment of Bone Fractures: A Numerical Study, ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Proceedings (IMECE) (2017)