Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! By
Individual and Combined Effects of Environmental Risk Factors for Esophageal Cancer Based on Results From the Golestan Cohort Study Publisher Pubmed



Sheikh M1, 2 ; Poustchi H3, 4 ; Pourshams A1, 4 ; Etemadi A1, 5 ; Islami F1, 6 ; Khoshnia M1, 7 ; Gharavi A1, 7 ; Hashemian M1, 5 ; Roshandel G1, 7 ; Khademi H1 ; Zahedi M8 ; Abediardekani B2 ; Boffetta P9 ; Kamangar F10 Show All Authors
Authors
  1. Sheikh M1, 2
  2. Poustchi H3, 4
  3. Pourshams A1, 4
  4. Etemadi A1, 5
  5. Islami F1, 6
  6. Khoshnia M1, 7
  7. Gharavi A1, 7
  8. Hashemian M1, 5
  9. Roshandel G1, 7
  10. Khademi H1
  11. Zahedi M8
  12. Abediardekani B2
  13. Boffetta P9
  14. Kamangar F10
  15. Dawsey SM5
  16. Pharaoh PD11
  17. Abnet CC5
  18. Day NE11
  19. Brennan P2
  20. Malekzadeh R1, 3, 4

Source: Gastroenterology Published:2019


Abstract

Background & Aims: Northeast Iran has one of the highest reported rates of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) worldwide. Decades of investigations in this region have identified some local habits and environmental exposures that increase risk. We analyzed data from the Golestan Cohort Study to determine the individual and combined effects of the major environmental risk factors of ESCC. Methods: We performed a population-based cohort of 50,045 individuals, 40 to 75 years old, from urban and rural areas across Northeast Iran. Detailed data on demographics, diet, lifestyle, socioeconomic status, temperature of drinking beverages, and different exposures were collected using validated methods, questionnaires, and physical examinations, from 2004 through 2008. Participants were followed from the date of enrollment to the date of first diagnosis of esophageal cancer, date of death from other causes, or date of last follow-up, through December 31, 2017. Proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between different exposures and ESCC. Results: During an average 10 years of follow-up, 317 participants developed ESCC. Opium smoking (HR 1.85; 95% CI 1.18–2.90), drinking hot tea (≥60°C) (HR 1.60; 95% CI 1.15–2.22), low intake of fruits (HR 1.48; 95% CI 1.07–2.05) and vegetables (HR 1.62; 95% CI 1.03–2.56), excessive tooth loss (HR 1.66; 95% CI 1.04–2.64), drinking unpiped water (HR 2.04; 95% CI 1.09–3.81), and exposure to indoor air pollution (HR 1.57; 95% CI 1.08–2.29) were significantly associated with increased risk of ESCC, in a dose-dependent manner. Combined exposure to these risk factors was associated with a stepwise increase in the risk of developing ESCC, reaching a more than 7-fold increase in risk in the highest category. Approximately 75% of the ESCC cases in this region can be attributed to a combination of the identified exposures. Conclusions: Analysis of data from the Golestan Cohort Study in Iran identified multiple risk factors for ESCC in this population. Our findings support the hypothesis that the high rates of ESCC are due to a combination of factors, including thermal injury (from hot tea), exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (from opium and indoor air pollution), and nutrient-deficient diets. We also associated ESCC risk with exposure to unpiped water and tooth loss. © 2019 AGA Institute
Other Related Docs
4. Opium Use and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention (2018)