Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Keratometric Indices for Detecting the Type of Keratoconus: A Combined Discriminant Analysis Publisher Pubmed



Yousefi A1 ; Hashemi H2 ; Khanlari M1 ; Amanzadeh K1 ; Aghamirsalim M3 ; Asgari S1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Noor Ophthalmology Research Center, Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Noor Research Center for Ophthalmic Epidemiology, Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Eye Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Clinical and Experimental Optometry Published:2020


Abstract

Background: This study sought to determine the diagnostic ability of anterior, posterior and total keratometric indices in discriminating keratoconus (KCN) stages 1 to 4 from normal corneas. Methods: Anterior and posterior simulated keratometry (sim-Ksteep and sim-Kflat), maximum keratometry (Kmax), Kmax y co-ordinate, anterior and posterior radii of curvature centred on the thinnest point (ARC-3 mm and PRC-3 mm), and anterior, posterior, and total asphericity (Q-value) measured by Pentacam were extracted from electronic medical records of 200 KCN and 200 normal cases. Stepwise leave-one-out cross-validation and areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) were used to detect the best set of indices for differentiating normal from low-grade (stages 1–2, Kmax ≤ 53.00 D) and high-grade (stages 3–4, Kmax > 53.00 D) KCN. Results: Mean age in KCN and normal groups was 33.10 ± 7.48 and 32.24 ± 9.00 years (p = 0.332), respectively. In the low-grade KCN group, PRC-3 mm (AUROC = 0.986), Kmax (AUROC = 0.979), and Kmax y co-ordinate (AUROC = 0.824) performed best, and the difference in AUROC between PRC-3 mm and Kmax was not significant (p = 0.153). In the high-grade KCN group, Kmax (AUROC = 1.000), PRC-3 mm (AUROC = 0.998), posterior Ksteep (AUROC = 0.970), posterior Q-value (AUROC = 0.940), and posterior Kflat (AUROC = 0.894) performed best, and there was no significant difference in AUROC values between Kmax and PRC-3 mm (p = 0.307) or between posterior Ksteep and posterior Q-value (p = 0.113). Conclusions: Among the studied keratometric indices, PRC-3 mm and Kmax appear to have the best ability for detecting mild to severe KCN. The next best factors which showed good discrimination ability were Kmax y co-ordinate in low-grade cases and posterior Ksteep and Q-value in high-grade cases. © 2019 Optometry Australia
Other Related Docs
11. Total Corneal Refractive Power and Shape in Down Syndrome, European Journal of Ophthalmology (2021)
13. Pentacam, Diagnostics in Ocular Imaging: Cornea# Retina# Glaucoma and Orbit (2020)
16. Average Biometry of the Cornea in a Large Population of Iranian School Children, Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics and Image Science# and Vision (2019)
17. Is Keratoconus More Severe in Pediatric Population?, International Ophthalmology (2017)
19. Characteristics and Associations of Keratoconus Patients, Contact Lens and Anterior Eye (2015)