Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Dietary Insulin Load and Index in Relation to Incident Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Cohort Study Publisher Pubmed



Aminianfar A1, 2 ; Zolfaghari H1 ; Soltani S1, 9 ; Hajianfar H3, 4 ; Azadbakht L1, 5, 6 ; Shahshahan Z7 ; Esmaillzadeh A1, 5, 8
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Research Center for Biochemistry and Nutrition in Metabolic Disease, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
  3. 3. Food Safety Research Center (Salt), Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
  4. 4. Food Security Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Community Nutrition, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  6. 6. Diabetes Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  7. 7. Department of Gynecology, School of Medicine Science, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  8. 8. Obesity and Eating Habits Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Molecular -Cellular Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  9. 9. Department of Nutritional Sciences, School of Health, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran

Source: Scientific Reports Published:2024


Abstract

No study has examined the association between dietary insulin load (DIL) and insulin index (DII) with developing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) during pregnancy. This study aimed to investigate the association between DIL and DII and risk of GDM in a group of pregnant women in Iran. In this prospective cohort study, 812 pregnant in their first trimester were recruited and followed. Usual dietary intakes were measured using a validated 117-item semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire at weeks 8–16 of gestations. DIL and DII were calculated based on earlier publications. GDM was diagnosed based on the results of a 50 g, 1 h oral glucose tolerance test at 24–28 weeks of gestation. Cox proportional hazards model was used to compute relative risks ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for GDM. Mean ± SD of age and BMI of study participants was 29.4 ± 4.84 y and 25.14 ± 4.08 kg/m2, respectively at study baseline. Mean ± SD of DIL was 80,629 ± 29,328 and mean ± SD of DII was 40.23 ± 4.93. Overall, 28.4% (n = 231) of study population developed GDM at weeks 24–28 of pregnancy. After adjustment for potential confounding variables, we found that women in the highest quartile of DIL had 53% elevated risk of GDM (95% CI 1.003, 2.34; P-trend = 0.14) compared with those in the lowest quartile. Additional adjustment for weight gain during pregnancy did not alter the association (RR = 1.53; 95% CI 1.003, 2.34; P-trend = 0.14). Women with the greatest DII had a 23% non-significant elevated risk of GDM (95% CI 0.84, 1.82; P-trend = 0.55) compared to those with the lowest DII. We found that women with the highest DIL were at greater risk of developing GDM during pregnancy. No significant association was seen between DII and risk of GDM. © The Author(s) 2024.
Other Related Docs
30. Review of Epidemiology of Gestational Diabetes in Iran, Journal of Isfahan Medical School (2010)
38. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Plymouth, U.K.: Prevalence, Seasonal Variation and Associated Factors, Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist (2006)
49. Screening and Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes- a Review Study, Journal of Isfahan Medical School (2023)