Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
The Association Between Dietary Glycemic Index and Load and Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Study Publisher Pubmed



Aminianfar A1 ; Soltani S1 ; Hajianfar H2, 3 ; Azadbakht L1, 4, 5 ; Shahshahan Z6 ; Esmaillzadeh A1, 4, 7
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Food Safety Research Center (salt), Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
  3. 3. Food Security Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Community Nutrition, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  5. 5. Diabetes Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  6. 6. Department of Gynecology, School of Medicine Science, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  7. 7. Obesity and Eating Habits Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Molecular -Cellular Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice Published:2020


Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to investigate the association between dietary GI and GL and risk of GDM in a group of pregnant women in Iran. Methods: A number of 812 pregnant women were recruited in their first trimester in a prospective study. A validated 117-item semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire was used to assess usual dietary intakes of participants at study baseline. Dietary GI and GL were calculated based on earlier publications. GDM was diagnosed based on the results of a fasting plasma glucose concentration and a 50-g, 1-h oral glucose tolerance test at 24–28 weeks of gestation. Cox proportional hazards model was used to compute relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for GDM. Results: Mean ± SD of age and BMI of study participants was 29.4 ± 4.84 y and 25.14 ± 4.08 kg/m2, respectively at study baseline. Mean ± SD of dietary GI was 58 ± 7 and that of dietary GL was 176 ± 42. Overall, 28.4% (n = 231) of study population developed GDM at weeks 24–28 of pregnancy. After adjustment for potential confounding variables, we found that women in the highest tertile of dietary GL were 43% more likely to develop GDM than those in the lowest tertile (95% CI: 1.01, 2.00; P-trend = 0.03). However, no significant association was seen between dietary GI (RR for the highest tertile compared to the lowest: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.61, 1.20; P-trend = 0.37), and risk of GDM. Conclusions: We found that women with the highest dietary GL were at a greater risk of developing GDM during pregnancy. No significant association was seen between dietary GI and risk of GDM. © 2020 Elsevier B.V.
Other Related Docs
13. Screening and Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes- a Review Study, Journal of Isfahan Medical School (2023)
23. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Plymouth, U.K.: Prevalence, Seasonal Variation and Associated Factors, Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist (2006)
30. Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, and Common Psychological Disorders, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2016)
40. Review of Epidemiology of Gestational Diabetes in Iran, Journal of Isfahan Medical School (2010)
42. Dietary Patterns Among Pregnant Women in the West-North of Iran, Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences (2008)