Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Evaluating the Radioprotective Effect of Cimetidine, Imod, and Hybrid Radioprotectors Agents: An In-Vitro Study Publisher Pubmed



Rahgoshai S1, 2 ; Mehnati P3 ; Aghamiri MR4 ; Haghighi Borujeini M5 ; Banaei A6 ; Tarighatnia A2, 7 ; Nader ND8 ; Kiapour M9 ; Abedifirouzjah R10
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Radiology Group, Shahid Beheshti of University of Paramedical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Medical Imaging Department, Aalinasab Hospital, Social Security Organization (SSO), Tabriz, Iran
  3. 3. Medical Physics Department, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Medical Radiation Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Medical Physics, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  6. 6. Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
  7. 7. Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tehran, University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  8. 8. Department of Anesthesiology, University at Buffalo, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY, United States
  9. 9. Department of Medical Physics Radiobiology and Radiation Protection, School of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
  10. 10. Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran

Source: Applied Radiation and Isotopes Published:2021


Abstract

Introduction: There are various radioprotective agents with different mechanisms that help to decrease ionizing radiation side effects. The radioprotective effect of Cimetidine and IMOD was assessed individually and compared with the hybrid radioprotectors agents (HRPAs-IMOD and Cimetidine) on human lymphocyte cells. Methods: Twenty healthy volunteers (ten men and ten women) participated in the present study. About 75 mL peripheral blood lymphocytes from each individual were collected, and they were divided into 36 groups. Briefly, the blood samples were treated with different concentrations of Cimetidine (12.6 and 25.2 μg/mL) and IMOD (0.04, 0.08, and 0.12 mg/mL), and also a combination of these agents, namely hybrid radioprotectors agents (HRPAs). Besides, the irradiated groups were exposed to 2 and 4 Gy of Co-60 gamma irradiation. The amount of cellular damage was assessed using the micronucleus assay. The repeated measurements and paired T-test statistical analysis were used to compare the micronucleus frequencies in different groups. Results: The micronucleus frequencies were significantly reduced (p < 0.05) in irradiated groups when the non-toxic concentrations of Cimetidine, IMOD, and HRPAs have been used. The reduction in micronucleus frequency was obtained 5–29% for Cimetidine and 40–51% for IMOD in peripheral blood lymphocytes irradiated with 2 Gy. This reduction in 4 Gy irradiation was 8–17% for Cimetidine and 27–37% for IMOD. The HRPAs resulted in a higher radioprotective effect, in a way that they cause up to 58% and 43% micronucleus frequency reduction in 2 and 4 Gy, respectively. Conclusion: In conclusion, the HRPAs showed the highest level of radioprotective. In addition, IMOD was remarkably higher radioprotective than Cimetidine, which may be related to its greater non-toxic concentrations. © 2021 Elsevier Ltd
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
21. Radiation Hormesis in the Scope of Radiology: A Review Article, Journal of Isfahan Medical School (2020)
22. Evaluation of Blood Parameters of the Medical Radiation Workers, Iranian Journal of Medical Physics (2019)