Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Evaluation of Three Methods for the Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity: A Randomised Clinical Trial Publisher Pubmed



Naghsh N1 ; Hosseini A2 ; Bazmara A2 ; Birang R1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Periodontology, Dental Implants Research Center, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Dental Students’ Research Committee, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: International Dental Journal Published:2024


Abstract

Objectives: In this study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of Gluma and high-power 980-nm diode laser, alone or in combination, in the treatment of cervical dentin hypersensitivity. Methods: A total of 20 patients (5 men and 15 women), aged 25 to 60 years, who met the inclusion criteria, were enrolled in this study. A total of 60 teeth were randomly divided into 4 groups: G1, 980 nm diode laser (in 2 sessions within a 1-week interval); G2, Gluma (in 2 sessions within a 1-week interval); G3, 980 nm diode laser plus Gluma; and G4: control. Thermal (cold spray) and air blast (air syringe of dental unit) stimuli were used to evaluate cervical dentin hypersensitivity in the patients. Their pain response was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) before treatment (baseline), in the first treatment session (15 minutes after treatment), in the second treatment session (after 1 week), and in 2-week, 1-month, and 3-month follow-up sessions. The obtained data were analysed using non-parametric tests, including Kruskal–Wallis test, Friedman test, Mann–Whitney test, and Wilcoxon test, in SPSS Version 22 at a significance level of P < .05. Results: Based on the results, there was a significant difference in the average VAS scores for cold and air blast stimuli between the 4 groups 1 month after the intervention (P < .05). Meanwhile, the laser group had the lowest VAS score for cold and air stimuli. On the contrary, no significant difference was found between the 4 groups 3 months after the intervention (P ˃ .05). Conclusion: The present results showed that 980-nm diode laser alone was more effective than the other 2 intervention methods for 1 month. Trial registration: The study was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20120901010703N5). © 2024 The Authors
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
29. Ft-Raman Spectroscopic Studies of Nd/Yag Laser-Irradiated Human Dental Enamel, Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering (2002)
32. Comparison of Success Rate and Onset Time of Two Different Anesthesia Techniques, Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal (2015)