Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Tomography-Based Definition of Keratoconus for Down Syndrome Patients Publisher



Asgari S1 ; Mehravaran S2 ; Aghamirsalim M3 ; Hashemi H1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Noor Ophthalmology Research Center, Noor Eye Hospital, No. 96 Esfandiar Blvd., Vali’asr Ave., Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. ASCEND Center for Biomedical Research, Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD, United States
  3. 3. Translational Ophthalmology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran

Source: Eye and Vision Published:2020


Abstract

Background: To assess the diagnostic ability of Pentacam HR (Oculus Optikgerate, GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) tomographic indices in discriminating keratoconus (KC) and KC suspect (KCS) in 10- to 30-year-old patients with Down syndrome (DS). Methods: In this study, DS patients were enrolled through special needs schools, the National Down Syndrome Society, and relevant non-profit organizations. Diagnoses were made independently by two experienced specialists. Forty Pentacam indices related to corneal thickness, volume, density, keratometry, power, shape, aberration, and elevation were extracted. For each index, the accuracy for KC and KCS diagnosis was evaluated using discriminant analysis and the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). From each enrolled case, data from only one eye was entered in the analyses. Results: Analyses were performed on data from 25 KC, 46 KCS, and 154 non-ectatic DS eyes. The best discriminants for KC were anterior higher order aberrations (HOA) (cutoff > 0.643, AUROC = 0.879), posterior vertical coma (cutoff > 0.0702 μm, AUROC = 0.875), anterior vertical coma (cutoff > 0.4124 μm, AUROC = 0.868), and total HOA (cutoff > 0.608, AUROC = 0.867). The difference between AUROCs were not statistically significant (all P > 0.05). For KCS, the best discriminants were minimum corneal thickness (cutoff ≤ 480.0 μm, AUROC = 0.775), corneal volume (cutoff ≤ 55.3 μm, AUROC = 0.727) and Belin Ambrosio display-total deviation (BAD-D) (cutoff > 2.23, AUROC = 0.718) with no significant difference between AUROCs (all P > 0.05). Conclusions: In this sample of DS patients, best KC discriminators were HOA and coma which showed good diagnostic ability. For KCS, best predictors were minimum corneal thickness, corneal volume, and BAD-D with relatively good diagnostic ability. Defining a new set of KC diagnostic criteria for DS patients is suggested. © 2020, The Author(s).
Other Related Docs
18. Pentacam, Diagnostics in Ocular Imaging: Cornea# Retina# Glaucoma and Orbit (2020)
20. Sirius®, Diagnostics in Ocular Imaging: Cornea# Retina# Glaucoma and Orbit (2020)
22. Can Oct Pachymetry Identify Keratoconus Suspects?, Iranian Journal of Ophthalmology (2015)
25. Characteristics and Associations of Keratoconus Patients, Contact Lens and Anterior Eye (2015)