Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Case–Control Matching: Effects, Misconceptions, and Recommendations Publisher Pubmed



Mansournia MA1 ; Jewell NP2, 3 ; Greenland S4, 5
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, PO Box 14155-6446, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, United States
  3. 3. Department of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley, CA, United States
  4. 4. Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
  5. 5. Department of Statistics, College of Letters and Science, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States

Source: European Journal of Epidemiology Published:2018


Abstract

Misconceptions about the impact of case–control matching remain common. We discuss several subtle problems associated with matched case–control studies that do not arise or are minor in matched cohort studies: (1) matching, even for non-confounders, can create selection bias; (2) matching distorts dose–response relations between matching variables and the outcome; (3) unbiased estimation requires accounting for the actual matching protocol as well as for any residual confounding effects; (4) for efficiency, identically matched groups should be collapsed; (5) matching may harm precision and power; (6) matched analyses may suffer from sparse-data bias, even when using basic sparse-data methods. These problems support advice to limit case–control matching to a few strong well-measured confounders, which would devolve to no matching if no such confounders are measured. On the positive side, odds ratio modification by matched variables can be assessed in matched case–control studies without further data, and when one knows either the distribution of the matching factors or their relation to the outcome in the source population, one can estimate and study patterns in absolute rates. Throughout, we emphasize distinctions from the more intuitive impacts of cohort matching. © 2017, Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
Other Related Docs
13. Using Causal Diagrams for Biomedical Research, Annals of Emergency Medicine (2023)
22. Causal Diagrams for Immortal Time Bias, International Journal of Epidemiology (2021)
36. Biases in Randomized Trials, Epidemiology (2017)
40. Risk Ratio Estimation in Longitudinal Studies, Archives of Iranian Medicine (2019)