Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Global and Regional Estimates of Prevalence of Refractive Errors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Publisher



Hashemi H1 ; Fotouhi A2 ; Yekta A3 ; Pakzad R1 ; Ostadimoghaddam H4 ; Khabazkhoob M5
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Noor Research Center for Ophthalmic Epidemiology, Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Optometry, School of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
  4. 4. Refractive Errors Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Journal of Current Ophthalmology Published:2018


Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was a systematic review of refractive errors across the world according to the WHO regions. Methods: To extract articles on the prevalence of refractive errors for this meta-analysis, international databases were searched from 1990 to 2016. The results of the retrieved studies were merged using a random effect model and reported as estimated pool prevalence (EPP) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: In children, the EPP of myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism was 11.7% (95% CI: 10.5–13.0), 4.6% (95% CI: 3.9–5.2), and 14.9% (95% CI: 12.7–17.1), respectively. The EPP of myopia ranged from 4.9% (95% CI: 1.6–8.1) in South–East Asia to 18.2% (95% CI: 10.9–25.5) in the Western Pacific region, the EPP of hyperopia ranged from 2.2% (95% CI: 1.2–3.3) in South-East Asia to 14.3% (95% CI: 13.4–15.2) in the Americas, and the EPP of astigmatism ranged from 9.8% in South-East Asia to 27.2% in the Americas. In adults, the EPP of myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism was 26.5% (95% CI: 23.4–29.6), 30.9% (95% CI: 26.2–35.6), and 40.4% (95% CI: 34.3–46.6), respectively. The EPP of myopia ranged from 16.2% (95% CI: 15.6–16.8) in the Americas to 32.9% (95% CI: 25.1–40.7) in South-East Asia, the EPP of hyperopia ranged from 23.1% (95% CI: 6.1%–40.2%) in Europe to 38.6% (95% CI: 22.4–54.8) in Africa and 37.2% (95% CI: 25.3–49) in the Americas, and the EPP of astigmatism ranged from 11.4% (95% CI: 2.1–20.7) in Africa to 45.6% (95% CI: 44.1–47.1) in the Americas and 44.8% (95% CI: 36.6–53.1) in South-East Asia. The results of meta-regression showed that the prevalence of myopia increased from 1993 (10.4%) to 2016 (34.2%) (P = 0.097). Conclusion: This report showed that astigmatism was the most common refractive errors in children and adults followed by hyperopia and myopia. The highest prevalence of myopia and astigmatism was seen in South-East Asian adults. The highest prevalence of hyperopia in children and adults was seen in the Americas. © 2018 Iranian Society of Ophthalmology
Other Related Docs
10. Prevalence of Amblyopia and Refractive Errors Among Primary School Children, Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research (2015)
17. Excimer Laser Refractive Surgery Rate in Iran: 2010–2014, Journal of Current Ophthalmology (2018)
21. Higher Order Aberrations in a Normal Adult Population, Journal of Current Ophthalmology (2015)
40. Total Corneal Refractive Power and Shape in Down Syndrome, European Journal of Ophthalmology (2021)
41. Biophysics of Vision, Biophysics and Neurophysiology of the Sixth Sense (2019)
42. Association Between Refractive Errors and Ocular Biometry in Iranian Adults, Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research (2015)
43. Eye Problems in Children With Hearing Impairment, Journal of Current Ophthalmology (2015)
44. Cohort Profile: Shahroud Schoolchildren Eye Cohort Study (Sscecs), International Journal of Epidemiology (2019)
45. Development of a Web-Based Patient Decision Aid for Myopia Laser Correction Method, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making (2024)