Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Application of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Evaluating Root Fenestration in an Iranian Subpopulation



Goodarzi M1 ; Soltani P4 ; Miri M5 ; Miri S6
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Dentist, Students Research Committee, School of Dentistry, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental Implants Research Center, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  6. 6. Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

Source: Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences Published:2020

Abstract

Aim: To determine the prevalence of root fenestration (RF) in an Iranian subpopulation using CBCT. Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out in Kermanshah, Iran on all patients requiring CBCT scan for various indications. RF was categorized into 6 types. Also, periapical status was classified in 3 levels. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, multiple logistic regression, and chi-square test (α=0.05). Results: In this study 230 CBCT images with a total of 3101 teeth were evaluated. RF was observed in 36.9% of the images and 3.9% of the teeth. RF was more common in maxilla and on the buccal side. Also it was more frequently observed in canines (25.8%). The most common type of RF was type I i.e. exposure of the apical third of the root regardless of involvement of the anatomic apex. Moreover, the most frequent involvement of periapical tissues was level 1 i.e. widened periodontal space without radiolucent periapical lesion. Conclusion: The overall prevalence of RF was 3.9%. RF was more common in maxilla and on the buccal aspect. The most common teeth involved with RF were canines followed by lateral incisors. RF type I was more frequently observed. Moreover, RF was more commonly associated to level 1 of periapical involvement. © 2020 Lahore Medical And Dental College. All rights reserved.
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
23. Canine Impaction and Fenestration Technique, Innovative Perspectives in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (2021)
34. Edentulism and Tooth Loss in Iran, International Journal of Preventive Medicine (2012)