Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Stimuli-Responsive Mesoporous Silica Nps As Non-Viral Dual Sirna/Chemotherapy Carriers for Triple Negative Breast Cancer Publisher



Darvishi B1 ; Farahmand L1 ; Majidzadeha K2
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Recombinant Proteins Department, Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, 1517964311, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Genetics Department, Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, 1517964311, Tehran, Iran

Source: Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids Published:2017


Abstract

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive and lethal subtype of breast cancer. It is associated with a very poor prognosis and intrinsically resistant to several conventional and targeted chemotherapy agents and has a 5-year survival rate of less than 25%. Because the treatment options for TNBC are very limited and not efficient enough for achieving minimum desired goals, shifting toward a new generation of anti-cancer agents appears to be very critical. Among recent alternative approaches being proposed, small interfering RNA (siRNA) gene therapy can potently suppress Bcl-2 proto-oncogene and p-glycoprotein gene expression, the most important chemotherapy resistance inducers in TNBC. When resensitized, primarily ineffective chemotherapy drugs turn back into valuable sources for further intensive chemotherapy. Regrettably, siRNA's poor stability, rapid clearance in the circulatory system, and poor cellular uptake mostly hampers the beneficial outcomes of siRNA therapy. Considering these drawbacks, dual siRNA/chemotherapy drug encapsulation in targeted delivery vehicles, especially mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) appears to be the most reasonable solution. The literature is full of reports of successful treatments of multi-drug-resistant cancer cells by administration of dual drug/siRNA-loaded MSNs. Here we tried to answer the question of whether application of a similar approach with identical delivery devices in TNBC is rational. © 2017 The Author(s)
Other Related Docs
19. A Concise Review on Cancer Treatment Methods and Delivery Systems, Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology (2019)
23. Nonviral Sirna Delivery Systems for Pancreatic Cancer Therapy, Biotechnology and Bioengineering (2021)
24. Cancer Nanomedicine: Special Focus on Cancer Immunotherapy, Cancer Immunology: Bench to Bedside Immunotherapy of Cancers# Second Edition (2020)
25. Gold Nanoparticles for Biomedical Imaging and Their Biological Response, New Developments in Gold Nanomaterials Research (2016)
27. Breast Cancer: Biology, Biomarkers, and Treatments, International Immunopharmacology (2020)
31. Protein Corona: Challenges and Opportunities for Cancer Therapy, Functionalized Nanomaterials for Cancer Research: Applications in Treatments# Tools and Devices (2024)
36. Ph-Sensitive Stimulus-Responsive Nanocarriers for Targeted Delivery of Therapeutic Agents, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology (2016)
37. Will Nanotechnology Bring New Hope for Gene Delivery?, Trends in Biotechnology (2017)
40. Nanoparticles and Biological Environment Interactions, Advanced Structured Materials (2019)
41. Liposome-Targeted Delivery for Highly Potent Drugs, Artificial Cells# Nanomedicine and Biotechnology (2017)
50. Recent Advances in Sirna Delivery Systems for Prostate Cancer Therapy, Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology (2022)