Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Effects of Resistance Training Combined With a Ketogenic Diet on Body Composition: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Publisher Pubmed



Ashtarylarky D1 ; Bagheri R2 ; Asbaghi O3 ; Tinsley GM4 ; Kooti W5 ; Abbasnezhad A6 ; Afrisham R7 ; Wong A8
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Exercise Physiology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
  3. 3. Student Research Committee, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Kinesiology & Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, United States
  5. 5. Lung Diseases & Allergy Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
  6. 6. Nutritional Health Research Center, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
  7. 7. Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  8. 8. Department of Health and Human Performance, Marymount University, Arlington, TX, United States

Source: Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition Published:2022


Abstract

We evaluated the effects of ketogenic diets (KDs) on body mass (BM), fat mass (FM), fat-free mass (FFM), body mass index (BMI), and body fat percentage (BFP) compared to non-KDs in individuals performing resistance training (RT). Online electronic databases including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, SCOPUS, and Ovid were searched to identify initial studies until February 2021. Data were pooled using both fixed and random-effects methods and were expressed as weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Out of 1372 studies, 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that enrolled 244 volunteers were included. The pooled results demonstrated that KDs significantly decreased BM [(WMD = −3.67 kg; 95% CI: −4.44, −2.90, p < 0.001)], FM [(WMD = −2.21 kg; 95% CI: −3.09, −1.34, p < 0.001)], FFM [(WMD = −1.26 kg; 95% CI: −1.82, −0.70, p < 0.001)], BMI [(WMD = −1.37 kg.m−2; 95% CI: −2.14, −0.59, p = 0.022)], and BFP [(WMD = −2.27%; 95% CI: −3.63, −0.90, p = 0.001)] compared to non-KDs. We observed beneficial effects of KDs compared to non-KDs on BM and body fat (both FM and BFP) in individuals performing RT. However, adherence to KDs may have a negative effect on FFM, which is not ameliorated by the addition of RT. © 2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
19. Regulating Eef2 and Eef2k in Skeletal Muscle by Exercise, Archives of Physiology and Biochemistry (2023)