Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Convolutional Neural Network in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps and Cancer Publisher Pubmed



Keshtkar K1 ; Safarpour AR2 ; Heshmat R3 ; Sotoudehmanesh R4 ; Keshtkar A5
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. University of Tehran School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Gastroenterohepatology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
  3. 3. Chronic Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Disease Research Center, Digestive Disease Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Health Sciences Education Development, Tehran University of Medical Sciences School of Public Health, Tehran, Iran

Source: Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology Published:2023


Abstract

Background/Aims: Convolutional neural networks are a class of deep neural networks used for different clinical purposes, including improving the detection rate of colorectal lesions. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the performance of convolutional neural network–based models in the detection or classification of colorectal polyps and colorectal cancer. Materials and Methods: A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and other related databases. The performance measures of the convolutional neural network models in the detection of colorectal polyps and colorectal cancer were calculated in the 2 scenarios of the best and worst accuracy. Stata and R software were used for conducting the meta-analysis. Results: From 3368 searched records, 24 primary studies were included. The sensitivity and specificity of convolutional neural network models in predicting colorectal polyps in worst and best scenarios ranged from 84.7% to 91.6% and from 86.0% to 93.8%, respectively. These values in predicting colorectal cancer varied between 93.2% and 94.1% and between 94.6% and 97.7%. The positive and negative likelihood ratios varied between 6.2 and 14.5 and 0.09 and 0.17 in these scenarios, respectively, in predicting colorectal polyps, and 17.1-41.2 and 0.07-0.06 in predicting colorectal polyps. The diagnostic odds ratio and accuracy measures of convolutional neural network models in predicting colorectal polyps in worst and best scenarios ranged between 36% and 162% and between 80.5% and 88.6%, respectively. These values in predicting colorectal cancer in the worst and the best scenarios varied between 239.63% and 677.47% and between 88.2% and 96.4%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic varied between 0.92 and 0.97 in the worst and the best scenarios in colorectal polyps, respectively, and between 0.98 and 0.99 in colorectal polyps prediction. Conclusion: Convolutional neural network–based models showed an acceptable accuracy in detecting colorectal polyps and colorectal cancer. © Author(s) – Available online at https://www.turkjgastroenterol.org.
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
14. Water Intake and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies, Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews (2021)