Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Febuxostat Therapy in Outpatients With Suspected Covid-19: A Clinical Trial Publisher Pubmed



Davoodi L1 ; Abedi SM2 ; Salehifar E3 ; Alizadehnavaei R4 ; Rouhanizadeh H5 ; Khorasani G6 ; Hosseinimehr SJ7
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Infection Diseases, Antimicrobial Resistance Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Hemoglobinopathy Institute, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
  4. 4. Gastrointestinal Cancer Research Center, Non-communicable Diseases Institute, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
  6. 6. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  7. 7. Department of Radiopharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran

Source: International Journal of Clinical Practice Published:2020


Abstract

Background: The aim of this clinical trial was to evaluate the effects of febuxostat (FBX) in comparison with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) on clinical symptoms, laboratory tests and chest CT findings in outpatients with moderate symptoms of COVID-19 infection. Methods: We conducted a clinical trial involving adult outpatients with the moderate respiratory illness following COVID-19 infection. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either FBX or HCQ for 5 days. The measured variables were needs to hospitalisation, clinical and laboratory data including fever, cough, breathing rate, C-Reactive Protein level, lymphocytes count at onset of admission and was well as at 5 days of treatments. In addition, CT findings were evaluated on admission and 14 days after initiation of treatment. Results: Sixty subjects were enrolled in the study with a 1 to 1 ratio in FBX and HCQ groups. On admission, fever (66.7%), cough (87%), tachypnoea (44.4%), dyspnoea (35%), elevated CRP value (94.4%) and lung involvement according to chest CT (100%) were documented in enrolled patients with insignificant difference between FBX and HCQ groups. Fever, cough and tachypnoea were significantly mitigated in both groups after five days of treatments without any significant differences between groups. The mean percentages of lung involvement were significantly reduced to 7.3% and 8% after 14 days of treatment with FBX and HCQ, respectively. In adult outpatients with moderate COVID-19 infection, the effectiveness of FBX and HCQ was not different in terms of resolution of clinical manifestations, laboratory tests and lung CT findings. Conclusion: This trial suggests that FBX is as an alternative treatment to HCQ for COVID-19 infection and may be considered in patients with a contraindication or precaution to HCQ. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Other Related Docs
25. Melatonin Could Be Beneficial in Sars-Cov-2 Therapy, Natural Products Journal (2021)
30. Dynamic Changes of Lymphocyte Subsets in the Course of Covid-19, International Archives of Allergy and Immunology (2021)
39. Intensive Care Admission Rate Due to Covid-2109, International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research (2020)
43. Immunosenescence and Inflamm-Ageing in Covid-19, Ageing Research Reviews (2023)
49. Covid-19: A Review on Treatment Strategies and Candidate Vaccines, Scientific Journal of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences (2021)