Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Vitamin D Supplementation and Body Fat Mass: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Publisher Pubmed



Golzarand M1, 2 ; Hollis BW3 ; Mirmiran P1, 2 ; Wagner CL3 ; Shabbidar S4
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Nutrition and Endocrine Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Obesity Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
  4. 4. Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: European Journal of Clinical Nutrition Published:2018


Abstract

Studies have indicated that 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) level in obese is lower than normal weight subjects; however, results of studies that investigated relationship between 25(OH)D and fat mass are inconsistent. In addition, several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have studied the influence of cholecalciferol supplement on percentage fat mass (PFM) but their results are conflicting. The objectives were to investigate the association between vitamin D3 and PFM pooling together observational studies and RCTs. PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Scopus were comprehensively searched from inception to September 2016. The Fisher’s Z (SE) of correlation coefficient and mean (SD) of changes in PFM from baseline were used to perform meta-analysis in observational studies and RCTs, respectively. To determine potential source of heterogeneity, subgroup and meta-regression analyses were conducted. Pooling correlation coefficients showed an inverse association between PFM (Fisher’s Z: − 0.24, 95% CI: − 0.30 to −0.18) and FM (Fisher’s Z: − 0.32, 95% CI: − 0.43 to − 0.22) and 25(OH)D. Subgroup analysis revealed continent but not gender influence on the effect size. Meta-regression analysis indicated that age, latitude, and longitude are not sources of heterogeneity. Combining trials showed vitamin D3 supplementation had a mild but insignificant effect on PFM (− 0.31%, 95% CI: − 1.07 to 0.44). Subgroup analyses indicated that type of cholecalciferol and treatment regimens explain source of heterogeneity. Age, baseline body mass index, dose of cholecalciferol, length of study, female (%), and baseline 25(OH)D are not source of heterogeneity. In conclusion, our results state that 25(OH)D level is inversely correlated with PFM but cholecalciferol supplementation had no effect on PFM. © 2018, Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature.
8. Effect of Vitamin D3 Supplementation on Blood Pressure in Adults: An Updated Meta-Analysis, Nutrition# Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases (2016)
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs