Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Comparison of Fecal and Oral Collection Methods for Studies of the Human Microbiota in Two Iranian Cohorts Publisher Pubmed



Wu Z1 ; Hullings AG1 ; Ghanbari R2 ; Etemadi A1 ; Wan Y3, 4 ; Zhu B3, 4 ; Poustchi H2 ; Fahraji BB5 ; Sakhvidi MJZ6 ; Shi J7 ; Knight R8, 9 ; Malekzadeh R2 ; Sinha R1 ; Vogtmann E1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Metabolic Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
  2. 2. Digestive Oncology Research Center, Digestive Disease Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research/Leidos Biomedical Research Laboratory, Inc., Frederick, MD, United States
  4. 4. Cancer Genomics Research Laboratory, Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
  5. 5. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
  6. 6. Department of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
  7. 7. Biostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
  8. 8. Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
  9. 9. Department of Computer Science & Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States

Source: BMC Microbiology Published:2021


Abstract

Background: To initiate fecal and oral collections in prospective cohort studies for microbial analyses, it is essential to understand how field conditions and geographic differences may impact microbial communities. This study aimed to investigate the impact of fecal and oral sample collection methods and room temperature storage on collection samples for studies of the human microbiota. Results: We collected fecal and oral samples from participants in two Iranian cohorts located in rural Yazd (n = 46) and urban Gonbad (n = 38) and investigated room temperature stability over 4 days of fecal (RNAlater and fecal occult blood test [FOBT] cards) and comparability of fecal and oral (OMNIgene ORAL kits and Scope mouthwash) collection methods. We calculated interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) based on 3 alpha and 4 beta diversity metrics and the relative abundance of 3 phyla. After 4 days at room temperature, fecal stability ICCs and ICCs for Scope mouthwash were generally high for all microbial metrics. Similarly, the fecal comparability ICCs for RNAlater and FOBT cards were high, ranging from 0.63 (95% CI: 0.46, 0.75) for the relative abundance of Firmicutes to 0.93 (95% CI: 0.89, 0.96) for unweighted Unifrac. Comparability ICCs for OMNIgene ORAL and Scope mouthwash were lower than fecal ICCs, ranging from 0.55 (95% CI: 0.36, 0.70) for the Shannon index to 0.79 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.86) for Bray-Curtis. Overall, RNAlater, FOBT cards and Scope mouthwash were stable up to 4 days at room temperature. Samples collected using FOBT cards were generally comparable to RNAlater while the OMNIgene ORAL were less similar to Scope mouthwash. Conclusions: As microbiome measures for feces samples collected using RNAlater, FOBT cards and oral samples collected using Scope mouthwash were stable over four days at room temperature, these would be most appropriate for microbial analyses in these populations. However, one collection method should be consistently since each method may induce some differences. © 2021, The Author(s).
Other Related Docs
17. Cohort Profile: The Urmia Lake Cohort Study (Ulcs), International Journal of Epidemiology (2022)